Heard its going to be around 60 million total, no more than 5 years.
DBacks fans must be devastated.
Why would it be?Think there may be a 5th year option that could push it to 60
Hope this is sarcasm
Why would it be?
Pollock is very good and was well liked there and now is playing for their main rival. Don’t understand why you don’t think the fans would be upset just because “he’s injury prone”He's missed 1/3 of the season the last 2 years and has been worth just over 2 fWAR each of those seasons. He was great in 2015 but due to injuries hasnt been able to build on that breakout.
However the Dodgers have a habit of turning average players into something special so with a good player like him I would not be shocked if he returns to being a 5/6 win player.
DBacks fans must be devastated.
DBacks fans must be devastated.
Not so much that they didn't re-sign him but the fact that he went to the DodgersI'm not. Pollock is an underrated player, but he hasn't been reliable with regards to staying on the field. I wouldn't have given him that contract.
Edit: He's on the wrong side of 30, and the Diamondbacks are in rebuilding mode. Re-signing Pollock would make no sense for them.
Not so much that they didn't re-sign him but the fact that he went to the Dodgers
Aren't the Dodgers conscious about the luxury tax threshold? Pollock also provides a right-handed bat, which the Dodgers were reportedly looking for.give a 31 year old a 5 year deal but won't give a 26 year old an 8 year deal.
sure, man.
give a 31 year old a 5 year deal but won't give a 26 year old an 8 year deal.
sure, man.