GDT: #78 | FLYERS at Avalanche | Wed., Mar. 28, 2018, 10:00 pm ET | ALT, NBCSP+

Status
Not open for further replies.

boxcar65

Registered User
Sep 24, 2007
1,545
1,643
Richmond, VA
Hot take, Neuvy starts and Haag comes back in and Sanheim gets some more learning time !!!!!

LOL. Sanheim should never go to the suite again unless he’s injured. I could see him inserting Hagg back in the lineup, but Manning has actually played halfway decent the past two games. Maybe for Gudas? Who knows with Hak’s logic.
 

wuf

Registered User
Sponsor
Aug 16, 2012
737
335
Philadelphia, PA
Colorado is surging. Their coach is not a beet farmer. I think this is a loss, and I foresee other losses in our future. This game is absolutely necessary to stay in contention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kelmitchell

TheKingPin

Registered User
Nov 16, 2005
20,635
10,093
Philadelphia, PA
I’d put in Hagg for amac. Amac is a dumpster fire. Manning played god enough last night not to get pulled even if he was responsible for a goal.
 

FlyersMania2

#FireHakstol
Jul 4, 2007
3,796
3,152
NJ
I’d put in Hagg for amac. Amac is a dumpster fire. Manning played god enough last night not to get pulled even if he was responsible for a goal.

So sad that we define "good" from Manning as only being responsible for one goal against. I can count at least 6 goals I've seen Manning directly responsible for in the last 6 weeks. Take away some of those goals and we have a few more wins. The standard for good should not be lower bc he's Manning. He sucks. We all know it. Difference is, his sucking never gets him a seat in the press box bc Hak has some affinity for undeserving, lackluster players - perhaps living out some vicarious dream of his through them
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,619
16,426
I really don't think MacDonald has had a bad season, and I'm a long-time anti-AMac guy. He's far from great, and like the other defenders has his share of d-zone turnovers, but on this team, this year, he's been adequate in some tough usage.

I think bigger problems of late have been a) goaltending; b) insufficient secondary scoring; c) struggling power play; and d) Ghost and Provorov have had some rough games defensively, as well as Gudas and Hagg (in those he played). Couturier also hasn't seemed quite like himself. I think they've got a lot of guys who are really banged up, but most teams do this time of year.
 

blinds

Registered User
Jan 5, 2012
3,111
526
I really don't think MacDonald has had a bad season, and I'm a long-time anti-AMac guy. He's far from great, and like the other defenders has his share of d-zone turnovers, but on this team, this year, he's been adequate in some tough usage.

I think bigger problems of late have been a) goaltending; b) insufficient secondary scoring; c) struggling power play; and d) Ghost and Provorov have had some rough games defensively, as well as Gudas and Hagg (in those he played). Couturier also hasn't seemed quite like himself. I think they've got a lot of guys who are really banged up, but most teams do this time of year.

This just seems contrarian for the sake of being contrarian. AMac has been as bad as he's ever been, just in a slightly diminished role. Do you remember the penalty last night that let them tie the game? What about every 2-on-1 against this season? The guy panics like no one I've ever seen or just never knows what decision to make under pressure. It's crazy to me that you're blaming every defenseman but AMac and Manning, our worst two defenders.
 

hatcher

Registered User
Sep 30, 2007
12,377
4,085
Kelowna BC
So sad that we define "good" from Manning as only being responsible for one goal against. I can count at least 6 goals I've seen Manning directly responsible for in the last 6 weeks. Take away some of those goals and we have a few more wins. The standard for good should not be lower bc he's Manning. He sucks. We all know it. Difference is, his sucking never gets him a seat in the press box bc Hak has some affinity for undeserving, lackluster players - perhaps living out some vicarious dream of his through them
The whole d is weak unless you count points. Ghost and provy look tired and aren't looking good at all either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: onlylordsvsmorebp

hatcher

Registered User
Sep 30, 2007
12,377
4,085
Kelowna BC
Coots play has fallen off a cliff. G is the only forward I trust. The young players I don't put in the mix as they are afew years away from being the finished product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: onlylordsvsmorebp

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
24,655
44,241
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
Hakstol won't insult the veteran MacDonald by sitting him and my pet theory is that he sees himself in Manning. Inserting Hagg would in theory be a positive solely because he didn't play last night and should have lots of pent-up energy for hittin' stuff. I would say Sanheim is coming out of the lineup but Pet Theory #2 is that Hextall has already told Hakstol to play him. The obvious answer is Hagg in for Manning (sorry boxcar!) since the latter won't be with the team after this season. But we shall see.
• Best option: sit MacDonald
• Most logical option: sit Manning
• Easiest option: sit Sanheim
• Most entertaining option: sit Provorov

I haven't seen any updates on Filppula for tonight. Should we assume he will be bringing Peroxide Power to the lineup?
 

Flyerfan4life

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
34,805
21,218
Richmond BC, Canada
Hakstol won't insult the veteran MacDonald by sitting him and my pet theory is that he sees himself in Manning. Inserting Hagg would in theory be a positive solely because he didn't play last night and should have lots of pent-up energy for hittin' stuff. I would say Sanheim is coming out of the lineup but Pet Theory #2 is that Hextall has already told Hakstol to play him. The obvious answer is Hagg in for Manning (sorry boxcar!) since the latter won't be with the team after this season. But we shall see.
• Best option: sit MacDonald
• Most logical option: sit Manning
• Easiest option: sit Sanheim
• Most entertaining option: sit Provorov

I haven't seen any updates on Filppula for tonight. Should we assume he will be bringing Peroxide Power to the lineup?


wait... do you really think Mannings not getting extended ???

wow ur in for a shock then...
 

BernieParent

In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
Mar 13, 2009
24,655
44,241
Chasm of Sar (north of Montreal, Qc)
wait... do you really think Mannings not getting extended ???

wow ur in for a shock then...

It will be a complete and utter shock for me if Manning is retained, given that neither Morin nor Hagg will be waiver exempt. Resigning Manning would mean dealing someone and even in my most cynical moments I can't see "Keep Brandon Manning on the Flyers" to be Hextall's endgame in any permutation. Maybe, maybe, if MacDonald or Gudas were dealt / bought out.

Even consideration of resigning Manning for depth and sending him to LHV is illogical. The path of least resistance is to let the dog walk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: onlylordsvsmorebp

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
55,735
42,731
Flyers lead the league in them!

Hakstol obviously tries to get that extra point and then doesn’t even care about winning it in OT. Other teams maintain possession through multiple shifts in OT. We have guys like Jake who just don’t get it.

They are also second in the league in OT wins with 8.

NHL.com - Stats
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
49,215
21,617
I'd rather have Manning than MacDonald next year.
Gudas is tougher, is this season an anomaly or was last season the anomaly and this season regression to the mean?
 

FLYguy3911

Sanheim Lover
Oct 19, 2006
53,082
86,408
It's crazy to me that you're blaming every defenseman but AMac and Manning, our worst two defenders.
Because criticizing those players means he’s indirectly criticizing the coach as well and that’s not going to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Striiker
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Inter Milan vs Torino
    Inter Milan vs Torino
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $2,752.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Metz vs Lille
    Metz vs Lille
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $354.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Cádiz vs Mallorca
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $240.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Bologna vs Udinese
    Bologna vs Udinese
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $265.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Clermont Foot vs Reims
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $15.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad