bennysflyers16
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2004
- 84,688
- 62,750
That's exactly why I'm very skeptical about Darling. They tend to make their goalies look better than they really are.Bishop shouldn't even be an option and Darling could have that Hawks factor. Member 17-1 Emery
You better believe I knew exactly what I was doing.
Hawks for their D man, Habs got another's one,,, 32 goes nowhere
Rangers and Bruins are both possibilities.
Bishop shouldn't even be an option and Darling could have that Hawks factor. Member 17-1 Emery
Still more playoff/playoff push teams in need of D depth than dont tbh.
BOS: K.Miller #5, C.Miller #6
CBJ: Nutivaara #6
NYI: Hickey #6
NYR: Clendening #6
OTT: Borowiecki #5, Wideman #6
TOR: Have ~3 #6+7s
ANA: Holzer #6
EDM: Nurse #5, Gryba #6
L.A: Gravel #6
MIN: Prosser #6
NSH: Irwin #5, Weber #6
STL: Bortuzzo #6
Bishop shouldn't even be an option and Darling could have that Hawks factor. Member 17-1 Emery
That's exactly why I'm very skeptical about Darling. They tend to make their goalies look better than they really are.
I'm waiting for Hak to start Neuvy next game even if Mason gets a shutout.
Can you imagine trying to find a chin strap for Weise's helmet? Might as well just use a belt.
Darling is 6'6" & can move. Him & Emery aren't really comparable from a physical/skill set standpoint.
Won't be missedRaffl has a LBI, will not return.
I'd rather he show him how to score
The wooos are back
I'd be up for taking a risk on him on a short term deal but I think he may get a 3 or 4 year deal from someone. Mason would be easier to sign short-term.