GDT: 5/20/15 - 8:00PM EDT - #1 New York VS #2 Tampa Bay [ECF GAME 3]

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheDaysOf 04

[ 2 6 ] [ 4 ]
Jun 23, 2007
53,094
22,930
NJ
uw6f5KU.png




giphy.gif

qXdovKp.png

nCi3so1.png

kvNI6H4.png

VwWyWTk.png

D9NInn4.png

CCAneTM.png


F5DyhjP.png


ppQinok.png
 

garmonbozia

Registered User
Jan 10, 2006
907
91
I'm putting on my Lightningfan24 pajamas and calling Cally gets on the board tonight and the Lightning survive some serious playoff drama to eke out a win!



Pacifiers please! Says it SO much better than the boobirds can.

Hedman skating through Tanner Glass, or anybody else just kicking his ass would be some tasty icing on the cake of our win too.
 
Last edited:

Outl4w

Registered User
Dec 16, 2011
3,671
2,166
FL
Stamkos, Johnson,Kucherov, and Callahan light the lamp tonight 4-2 BOLTS!
 

Flat Ronnie

Registered User
Feb 11, 2014
5,587
2,983


Floridian propaganda, how is that possible !



I expect Amalie to absolutely rock tonight.



TB peaked at 11.2 from 10:15-30

Huge numbers. I have to say that I am completely impressed and somewhat suprised how obsessed Tampa Bay is with this team right now.
 

Flat Ronnie

Registered User
Feb 11, 2014
5,587
2,983
What do these numbers signify? 11.2 what?

I'm guessing Households. Which basically is a percentage of households watching the program.

For example, the Dancing with the Stars Finale did a 8.4 in households last night. This is on a major network with strong mass and female appeal. Billboard Awards did a 6. Bucs do somewhere between 15-20.

I highly doubt that this is a specific demo like Adults 25-54 for example. If it was, those would be NFL type numbers locally.
 
Last edited:

MattM92

Registered User
Dec 8, 2010
6,925
516
FL
I'm guessing Households. Which basically is a percentage of households watching the program.

For example, the Dancing with the Stars Finale did a 8.4 in households last night. This is on a major network with strong mass and female appeal.

I highly doubt that this is a specific demo like Adults 25-54 for example. If it was, those would be NFL type numbers locally.

Ah ok. Not bad at all.
 

Legionnaire11

Registered User
Jul 12, 2007
14,134
8,184
Murfreesboro
atlantichockeyleague.com
Pretty sure when they list it as "8.7 Rating" it refers to total households in the market. If they had listed it as a Share as opposed to a rating, then it's number of households actually watching television.

It's a good number for hockey, and it's not surprising with the amount of Bolts support i've been seeing. Lots of shirts, hats and car flags from individuals and a good amount of businesses (both chain and local) with "Go Bolts!" on their signs/windows.

Also listening to sports radio, the Lightning are a huge topic right now. And it's decent discussion too, not just "uh, I like hockey... Stamkos is good". There's some amount of Bucs/Winston talk, and of course the Rays are doing better than expected. But i'd estimate at least 50% of everything i've heard in the last 3-4 weeks is lightning.
 

Flat Ronnie

Registered User
Feb 11, 2014
5,587
2,983
Pretty sure when they list it as "8.7 Rating" it refers to total households in the market. If they had listed it as a Share as opposed to a rating, then it's number of households actually watching television.

It's a good number for hockey, and it's not surprising with the amount of Bolts support i've been seeing. Lots of shirts, hats and car flags from individuals and a good amount of businesses (both chain and local) with "Go Bolts!" on their signs/windows.

Also listening to sports radio, the Lightning are a huge topic right now. And it's decent discussion too, not just "uh, I like hockey... Stamkos is good". There's some amount of Bucs/Winston talk, and of course the Rays are doing better than expected. But i'd estimate at least 50% of everything i've heard in the last 3-4 weeks is lightning.

Pretty much.

It is a very good number for anything. Especially considering it is on somewhat of a fringe station with absolutely NO national promotion.
 

Iceman

Registered User
Jun 9, 2014
10,640
2,024
Why fill in Cally and Paquette as complinentary players? I guess they can fit on any line but I rather see them with Boyle on third line and put out morrow and brown when we need to give the team som spark and bring physicality.

But what do I know? I guess we have to trust Cooperman.
 

zeykshade

Registered User
May 27, 2011
8,782
2,222
Tannhauser Gate
Betting that the Rangers follow their normal pattern W gm 1, L gm 2, W gm3...

No way they play that awful on the road. Bolts will have to clean up their 1st period as well.

No way Lundqvist has another awful game. 3-1 Rangers.
 

AK Bolt Fan

Registered User
Jan 17, 2015
77
13
Chugiak, Alaska
Betting that the Rangers follow their normal pattern W gm 1, L gm 2, W gm3...

No way they play that awful on the road. Bolts will have to clean up their 1st period as well.

No way Lundqvist has another awful game. 3-1 Rangers.

I won't make any prediction, but if you are any type of a Bolts fan, and say something like that? wow. I am sure they would love you on the Rangers forum.
 

AK Bolt Fan

Registered User
Jan 17, 2015
77
13
Chugiak, Alaska
Betting that the Rangers follow their normal pattern W gm 1, L gm 2, W gm3...

No way they play that awful on the road. Bolts will have to clean up their 1st period as well.

No way Lundqvist has another awful game. 3-1 Rangers.

To elaborate, the Rangers lost game 1, against the Caps, won game 2 and then lost, the next 2 to put them on the brink of elimination. I fail to see your point. Please elaborate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad