I am...honestly baffled at someone saying "so what he couldn't see the puck". Like I almost don't even know if you're serious.
That's like saying "Hey, sucks you got hit by that car bro. You didn't see it coming but...you know, it's your job to ensure you don't get hit by a ****ing car. Tough luck"
Insanity. Children on this board.
If I'm being paid to look for cars coming and I don't see one and it hits me, your damn right I should have looked harder.
And that's a horrendous analogy by the way.
Why don't you try and read the argument of it being a bad goal again, comprehend it this time, and this will be a much better conversation.
Bishop explained that he was completely screened on the goal. He didn't see the release or the flight of the puck at any point. I described the play and how he was screened completely earlier. Bishop confirmed it post game. Unless it's your contention that Bishop should make it common practice to drop into the Butterfly randomly upon the puck entering the zone.
I never said he saw it and therefore calling him a liar. No idea where you get that from.
What I'm saying is this, and Butchered pay attention.
The shot was 40' out. It was a weak wrist shot. He had two or three players skate by him during the shot but no one stood right in front of him. Bishop is 6'7. He wasnt expecting a shot there and wasnt looking around the streaking guys to track and target the puck. He should have been. He didnt.
It wasnt 100% his fault. He is not garbage. He let in a bad goal. At a bad time. It happens to every goalie but that doesn't make it not a bad goal.
Why is this so hard to understand what's being said?
The funniest thing about this, is if it was Garon, every single person would be complaining about the goal. And if you disagree with that, you are kidding yourself.