flyershockey
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2006
- 13,466
- 6,569
I can't think of anything worse than being a Sabres fan and having to live in western NY. Yuck.
Could probably go further than that and say he's outperformed the others too. The only one who can be debated is Sanheim.This is a dude who steadily took Minnesota nowhere. He just supposedly spent the offseason wanting to trade Ghost and brought in Gus to replace him. Ghost has steadily and blatantly outperformed the "replacement." Dude was set to make the defense even worse. Fortunately, he failed.
If they don't lose at least one of these two games I'll be utterly shocked.
Point is they haven't done anything awful. When 160 minutes of Stewart, or 4 games of Prosser are your biggest complaints . . .
He hasn't given Weise a 4 year deal, or MacDonald $30M.
I don't lose sleep over 4th and 5th rd picks or 1 year deals. Those are fungible assets.
And why do people crap all over Hayes? He's exactly what we thought he was.
He's just behind G in xGF and xGFrel, 23 points in 33 games (56 point pace). Only knock this year is his PK is subpar compared to last year, but he's stepped up there the last few games.
You don't think as a FA he couldn't get a 5yr/$35M deal this offseason?
This is such an asinine comment. Of course players are inherited, but at the end of the day the GM, like a ship’s captain, is responsible for everything. He’s had nearly 2 years to put his stamp on this team, and I think he’s done a crap job.I wasn’t aware that NHL rosters were created from scratch via a fantasy draft before each season.
With the cap being flat, there is no way Hayes would get 7 million per right now. 5-5.5 would be more likely.Point is they haven't done anything awful. When 160 minutes of Stewart, or 4 games of Prosser are your biggest complaints . . .
He hasn't given Weise a 4 year deal, or MacDonald $30M.
I don't lose sleep over 4th and 5th rd picks or 1 year deals. Those are fungible assets.
And why do people crap all over Hayes? He's exactly what we thought he was.
He's just behind G in xGF and xGFrel, 23 points in 33 games (56 point pace). Only knock this year is his PK is subpar compared to last year, but he's stepped up there the last few games.
You don't think as a FA he couldn't get a 5yr/$35M deal this offseason?
With the cap being flat, there is no way Hayes would get 7 million per right now. 5-5.5 would be more likely.
FYI Bettman recently commented that the cap would be flat for the next couple seasons, but whatever. I’ll just agree to disagree, it will save time.Cap goes up next year and escalates after that due to the new TV contracts.
Hayes would easily get $7M, he's a legitimate 2C, not many hit FA.
"The real issue is that Fletcher keeps adding bad players to the roster while bleeding away assets, occasionally for nothing. Thompson, Grant, Gus, Prosser, Stewart."
That's Beef's beef. The total assets used on these five, a 4th and 5th rd pick. Peanuts.
As far as drafting, one won't know for years, but York, Brink, Attard, Millman, Foerster, Wisdom, Desnoyers have all met or exceeded expectations.
Cap goes up next year and escalates after that due to the new TV contracts.
Hayes would easily get $7M, he's a legitimate 2C, not many hit FA.
"The real issue is that Fletcher keeps adding bad players to the roster while bleeding away assets, occasionally for nothing. Thompson, Grant, Gus, Prosser, Stewart."
That's Beef's beef. The total assets used on these five, a 4th and 5th rd pick. Peanuts.
As far as drafting, one won't know for years, but York, Brink, Attard, Millman, Foerster, Wisdom, Desnoyers have all met or exceeded expectations.
Asinine? That’s exactly what you’re acting like: That a GM can create his roster at will.This is such an asinine comment. Of course players are inherited, but at the end of the day the GM, like a ship’s captain, is responsible for everything. He’s had nearly 2 years to put his stamp on this team, and I think he’s done a crap job.
Cases in point:
1984-Bob Clarke inherits a team that was average at best and terrible in the playoffs the prior season. He hires Mike Keenan and turns over a 3rd of the roster by the 85 deadline. The team wins the President’s Trophy and goes to the finals
1994: Again, Clarke takes over a team that shit the bed the prior season. He brings in a new coach and nearly completely remakes the D group over the space of a few months. The team goes to the Conference final.
2007: Paul Holmgren takes over the worst team in the NHL and makes the moves to have them in the final 4 in 2008.
I get that the cap, and especially Covid, make things more difficult. But there is no excuse for ever having garbage like Stewart or Prosser in the lineup, or the fact that Therrien, and Lappy, are still assistants. Is Fletcher the worst GM ever? No, not even close. But he is mediocre and mediocre managers don’t build Stanley Cup champions.
Friedman did absolutely nothing in the few games he played last year and this year, so what is there to miss? I was disappointed, thought after all the reports of him "improving" he was ready to step up. Watching the Phantoms last night, Day looks about as good as Friedman. Actually none of the D-men stood out the way Willman, Laczynski and Allison stood out. But neither did Friedman the way Myers and Sanheim did.
Homer leaked draft picks left and right, Fletcher got his 2nd rd pick back in the draft and maximized his assets.
Fletcher made the moves to get them to the POs last year, and refrained from panic moves so far this year. So to me that's a "win-win."
This summer will be his test, with the ED behind him, and film on the current players, that's when he should remake the roster.
But I suspect there will be much gnashing of teeth around here.
So he has no control over the coaching staff or in stuff like waiving and losing Friedman, who, while nothing special, is still a better player than Prosser and possibly Hagg. Ok, I guess he’s just doing a dandy job then.Asinine? That’s exactly what you’re acting like: That a GM can create his roster at will.
Then you cite 2 pre-cap examples, & 07 when Holmgren inherited a Grand Canyon-sized amount of cap space, to prove the Fletcher should be able to make the same kind of moves in a completely different, flat-cap world, where very few transactions are being completed due to cap restrictions, the short season, & a looming expansion draft.
Now THAT is “asinine.”
So he has no control over the coaching staff or in stuff like waiving and losing Friedman, who, while nothing special, is still a better player than Prosser and possibly Hagg. Ok, I guess he’s just doing a dandy job then.
I really don’t get the blind faith some show in Fletcher. What has he done to earn such admiration?
He's an authority figure. Thus he is to be revered by default.
That’s been the franchise policy since Holmgren left.He outplayed Hogg and Prosser. This ace coaching staff and management elected to prefer worse players.
Is preferring inferior players over superior players good management?