Something for the analytic types... from an article above:
"The 1983-84 Oilers' team had such a dismal shot differential, it would have placed 19th in the league last season, just behind the Philadelphia Flyers."
"As everyone in the analytics community knows, shot differential is critical to winning games. Teams that get outshot may do well for a while, but eventually the math catches up with them and they start losing more games than they win."
And finally...
"Many advanced stats critics complain that the statisticians are so in love with the math that it leads them astray. They have a point here: data provide a useful screen, but they’re only part of the picture. If you don’t understand what else is happening in the game, you’ll reach some very foolish conclusions."
Are you reading thins MacTavish? Stats alone lead you to some very foolish conclusions, and that goes for those charts and graphs some people use to demonstrate the effectiveness of a player. 83-84 Oilers were one of the best hockey teams ever, and players and people win games, not advanced stats and numbers.
Thanks BB... always appreciated.