ref88
Registered User
- Feb 14, 2018
- 498
- 172
Which one of the five requirements does it not meet? Curious how you can justify that.Hold sure..Doesn't meet the requirements for a penalty shot however.
34 in all situations apparentlyone of the best games I have seen by a goalie even with the 2 goals against. Panthers had 25+ scoring chances
Well he didn't foul him from behind. I can see how you would think that but that's not the spirit of the rule. After further review even a hold is debatable here.Which one of the five requirements does it not meet? Curious how you can justify that.
Respectfully disagree on both counts. Dubois is literally directly behind him, and grabs his left arm with his free hand. Should have been a penalty shot. An absolute disgrace it wasn't even called a penalty.Well he didn't foul him from behind. I can see how you would think that but that's not the spirit of the rule. After further review even a hold is debatable here.
Well he didn't foul him from behind. I can see how you would think that but that's not the spirit of the rule. After further review even a hold is debatable here.
one of the best games I have seen by a goalie even with the 2 goals against. Panthers had 25+ scoring chances
Red wings deserve to be picking 10th for a decade before a bone is thrown their wayWell at least the Yotes can get it done.
Thanks for nothing, Buffaslug!
Red wings deserve to be picking 10th for a decade before a bone is thrown their way
Cups bro....One top ten pick in the last 25 years... Don't think anybody's been throwing us bones for quite some time.
Cups bro....