Juxtaposer
Outro: Divina Comedia
Yeah, it just made me anxious as hell.I want this to be true but sadly it doesn't line up with Sheng being at the actual drawing. All that tweet did was ramp up my anxiety
Yeah, it just made me anxious as hell.I want this to be true but sadly it doesn't line up with Sheng being at the actual drawing. All that tweet did was ramp up my anxiety
I hate to sound like a broken record, but anything that's not reverse standings order is overthinking itHonestly taking the Sharks out of it for a minute it really feels like they have overthought the current lottery format.
I dont like pure reverse standing because of the division/conference's produce unequal schedules.I hate to sound like a broken record, but anything that's not reverse standings order is overthinking it
Or Chicago, Utah, San Jose. Either way we get ZeevMy guess would be Utah, Chicago, San Jose.
I don't disagree but I think any sort of lottery overcorrects those discrepanciesI dont like pure reverse standing because of the division/conference's produce unequal schedules.
Ill still state either a 25% lottery across the 4 divisions or a 50% lottery across the two conferences. After that, points.
The current construction of the lottery makes rebuilding take longer; it needs to be simplified. The NHL overcorrected on its "anti-tank" belief. If you want to limit the #1 pick to X number of times over a certain time frame, I think thats reasonable but really, make it simple.I feel like a lottery win should only allow like a move of 5 spots. Or a significant increase in the odds for the bottom 5 teams. Like 80% for 1OA for last seed
This is probably the best compromise - don't have a lottery, but have the limit on how many times a team can keep the #1OA. You could even make it top-3 if you think it's that big of a problem.The current construction of the lottery makes rebuilding take longer; it needs to be simplified. The NHL overcorrected on its "anti-tank" belief. If you want to limit the #1 pick to X number of times over a certain time frame, I think thats reasonable but really, make it simple.
What if Sheng needs to pee? Can't he use his Apple Watch to text the results?
My guess would be Utah, Chicago, San Jose.
But it doesn't disincentivize it, that's the whole thing. The Sharks literally had one of the worst seasons in NHL history because of the potential to draft a guy like Celebrini. Drafting high, and especially getting the 1st pick, is worth any chance that they may not get it, no matter the odds.I don't think the draft lottery is that complicated, and I do think it's a good thing to have to disincentive tanking. Frankly, I would make it even flatter.
That being said, I am well aware this statement dooms the sharks this evening. My apologies.
Hawks win
I would take this over Chicago getting Celebrini. When we don’t get first, dropping down to three isn’t that bad as 2-whatever are the same tier.That would align with classic sharks luck
yeah I would perfer it, also would stop Chicago winning next years lottery still as second place still counts for thatI would take this over Chicago getting Celebrini. When we don’t get first, dropping down to three isn’t that bad as 2-whatever are the same tier.
As long as Chicago or Anaheim don’t win, I don’t care who wins it besides us.
you "rehearse" until you get it right.....duhSo they ran the lottery and didn't get the outcome they wanted so they have to run it again.