Guess we don't have to worry about the Bunting distraction
So if he's going to be back in then he must make the team better right?
If he makes the team better than why not have him in in game 5?
Guess we don't have to worry about the Bunting distraction
I see nothing amiss with that lineup...particularly since 91 is moved down. Cirelli with Perry could be a big plus, and may give Paul some giddyup.New lines combination are needed to counteract Marner & Matthews being on separate lines.
Colton Point kucherov
Hagel Stamkos killorn
Paul Cirelli Perry
Maroon Bellemare Jeannot
Guess we don't have to worry about the Bunting distraction
The problem is playing Stammer in a shutdown role against Marner and Matthews.I see nothing amiss with that lineup...particularly since 91 is moved down. Cirelli with Perry could be a big plus, and may give Paul some giddyup.
I'd rather see Eyssimont on the third line and if Jeannot has to be in, sit Maroon.
Listening to JB describe Jeannot back when he traded for him, it sounds like he's talking about a different player:
Matthews is on line 1 which is why I have Point matched up against him. Marner is rw on line 2 which is why I have Hagel Lw matched up against him as Hagel can keep pace with Marner which will hopefully limit Marner‘s chances.Every pre write their Eulogies? Except Byr, that guy probably has an Oscar acceptance speech written up already.
The problem is playing Stammer in a shutdown role against Marner and Matthews.
Switch tanner and Perry. Pretty simple imoHagel has to be moved back to the top line, they're neutered as ES right now and Hagel is playing out of his mind. Stamkos has added nothing.
Hagel-Point-Kucherov
Killorn-Paul-Stamkos
Jeannot-Cirelli-Colton
Maroon-Bellemare-Perry
Enough speed to cover for Jeannot on the 3rd, need to get Paul going offensively.