Gryz is the #3D in the entire NHL in +\- since he joined the league. He has played poorly this year. If a team likes him before 20 bad games in and out of the lineup with injury, they are still going to like him.
Boston Bruins 2023-24 Roster and Salary Cap Discussion VI
- Thread starter Gee Wally
- Start date
- Status
Gryz is the #3D in the entire NHL in +\- since he joined the league. He has played poorly this year. If a team likes him before 20 bad games in and out of the lineup with injury, they are still going to like him.
easton117
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2017
- 5,084
- 5,679
Not trying to excuse his lack of production. But if I had to pick one guy in the league that would struggle mentally in a contract year Debrusk would be on my short list.
Have to wonder if future worries are weighing on the present.
Have to wonder if future worries are weighing on the present.
I never wanted to say it in regards to COVID, cuz that was some weird shit, but him going thru this again over stress about a contract (we are guessing) isn’t exactly what you would call mental toughness.
He fits in perfectly, team has no mental toughness or any other toughness for that matter.
Hopefully a big shake up real soon before its to late
CellyHard
Registered User
Merkulov needs to be given a shot before Poitras comes back. They need to see what they have in this kid. I also think Geekie deserves a chance with our top guys
Zacha Geekie Pastrnak
Marchand Coyle Debrusk
JVR Merkulov Heinen
Lauko Beecher Frederic
Zacha Geekie Pastrnak
Marchand Coyle Debrusk
JVR Merkulov Heinen
Lauko Beecher Frederic
I'm not trying to single you out or anything, but I've seen this sentiment in other places and I'm gonna lose my mind if I keep seeing people suggest to move Zacha to the wing for Geekie. Zacha is our best center, and the Zacha-Pasta combo is the only consistent source of 5v5 offense we've had all season. It makes no sense.
CellyHard
Registered User
It’s all good man I just think Zacha and Pasta are going to do their thing regardless if he’s in the middle or not.
Coyle isn’t moving away from center and Geekie, although a small sample size, has looked better at center than wing and has looked good playing higher in the lineup.
It also opens up the 3C for Merkulov and when Poitras returns.
They’re going thru a skid right now, I’m only suggesting it for a couple weeks and maybe things click
easton117
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2017
- 5,084
- 5,679
Everyone handles stressors differently. And things that stress some out wouldn’t bother others.
Hell I still dream of university projects being due and I graduated over 20 years ago lol.
But ya, it’s all guessing. Maybe he’s hurt. Maybe not. Maybe this is just what he is. Streaky player that you probably wouldn’t want to put a whole lot of faith in producing over an entire season.
Zacha isn’t great on faceoffs. He isn’t great moving through center ice. He is pretty good using his size defending down low, but nothing amazing. He wants to play center. The team needs centers. He is probably better as a winger.
CellyHard
Registered User
Also my thinking is Zacha and Pasta aren't moving away from each other any time soon and is the defacto #1 line. Can you win in the playoffs with Zacha as your #1 center? Probably not. Could you win with him as your 1st line LW? Sure could.
Need to find a #1 center that compliments them (Lindholm on paper is a great fit)
I mean Zacha is above 50% on the season, I think he's holding his own at the dot. Regardless, long term whether Zacha ends up as a center or a winger is a different story, but right now he and Coyle are the best 2 guys you down the middle and moving either of them out of that position makes you a worse team. I don't even dislike Geekie or anything, but he's not better then either of those guys and I'm not displacing either for him.
UncleRico
Registered User
- May 8, 2017
- 7,988
- 10,015
I agree. I think he is a much better winger than he is a center. I want to see a line with him opposite pastrnak with a legit center in the middle.
Would like to reunite the Coyle line somehow.
Zacha Geekie Pastrnak
JVR Coyle Frederic
Marchand Merkulov DeBrusk
Maybe see how swapping Geekie and DeBrusk looks, too.
It’s all just awkward. You want to break in some of these kids, but there are not many spots to go around, especially if you want to try to win games. But a lot of the guys filling the spots aren’t anything special either.
Something we don’t talk about is the fourth line.
Beecher rocking 37 or 38% of shots, scoring chances and high danger chances on the ice. That’s…really bad. But you do want to give him a chance to grow into the role, right? Just seems like Lauko and Steen aren’t the right help.
Beecher rocking 37 or 38% of shots, scoring chances and high danger chances on the ice. That’s…really bad. But you do want to give him a chance to grow into the role, right? Just seems like Lauko and Steen aren’t the right help.
Beecher has been arguably the most consistent center on the team. He’s been fantastic in a 4th line role.
Lauko has had his ups and downs. I wasn’t seeing it from him but he’s played his best games recently..
Bottom line is these two aren’t the reason the Bs are losing.
Dr Quincy
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2005
- 28,710
- 10,568
He's done some good things and has been better than I expected. Good skater and showing more offense than I thought he'd have. He has some physicality.
But at the same time there are some issues: He's 1 of only of their regular Fs who gets outscored when he's on the ice. You'd like your 4th line to at least hold their own, but the team allows more goals per minute w/ him on the ice than any other F (ok he's tied w/ Pasta but obviously the team scores way more Gs w/ Pasta on the ice). He's bottom in xG%, bottom in Scoring Change %, bottom in High Danger %. But he's been good on the dot and is still learning.
He's been good defensively at lower levels, so you have to hope that as he gets more experience he'll improve in those areas.
I'd also like to see stats on which D pair is most commonly on the ice with the 4th line. It feels to me like the third pair, and that's been awful for the Bruins. A basically all rookie 4th line with Mitchell/Wotherspoon/Shattenkirk out there with them is going to be tough at times.
Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
Who's coaching? pretty sure Kelly is one of the coaches? What ever he's preaching is not working. Team is puppy love soft when the game is on the line.
Beecher is the one I want out taking that big face off when the game is on the line. Certainly not Coyle.
Coyle is a big reason for these collapses at the end of games, but we keep rolling him out there. Bad coaching
Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
4th line definitely not getting the job done.
Three players with very little NHL experience all trying to learn the NHL game without much on-ice guidance.
Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
Beecher (54.7%) against mostly other 4th liners, Coyle (52.3%) against mostly top line centers.
- Jan 29, 2003
- 25,532
- 21,049
I’m not replying to this to be argumentative and has nothing to do with you….its just a really simple and convenient example for my larger point.
This is a great example of how stats only matter in context.
Take those overall face off numbers.
Maybe Coyle won 80% of faceoffs when the team is up by 3 goals, 70% when up by 2 but lost 95% in the last 2 minutes of games where they are up a goal in the defensive zone.
If the above were true, that would make me reconsider whether or not I‘d use him to close out a game.
I‘m sure the team probably keeps more situational stats, which guide Monty’s coaching. At least I hope they do.
Please continue here:
- Status
