Pinto needs to find more pace to play centre in the NHL.I don’t think White is an automatic to protect.
If DJ starts using him a bit in overtime or 4v5 I think he may support keeping him. I’d really like to see if White can replace Tierney in the PK.
If Brown and Pinto show that they can play in the league White is basically a 4C and Bishop types can provide similar play. The idea of freeing up $21 million may be worth more than hoping he improves into a useful player.
Seattle probably passes anyway. We could also explore trading Daccord. Abramov, D’Accord, Brown, White etc.
Pinto needs to find more pace to play centre in the NHL.
Yes, he's played well in his role. He's a heart and soul guy that does what's necessary, sacrifices his body to block shots, etc. Yet, I would think its worth remembering that 4th line role players are the easiest to replace.Watson should be protected - he provides way more positive value than many of our the under achieving over paid players.
Yes, he's played well in his role. He's a heart and soul guy that does what's necessary, sacrifices his body to block shots, etc. Yet, I would think its worth remembering that 4th line role players are the easiest to replace.
For reference, it cost a 4th to acquire Watson. Potential to get an equivalent through free agency as well one would think.I agree ... we are very thin on decent PKers ... I doubt we could easily replace his physicality and PK ability without costing us a decent asset or more cap space/salary.
For reference, it cost a 4th to acquire Watson. Potential to get an equivalent through free agency as well one would think.
Literally impossibleAt this point I would protect two goalies. What’s the least amount of d men we can protect ?
Really. There’s no variation where two goalies are protected? SillyLiterally impossible
IDK. Spending $5 m or over to keep Watson and replace White (and his $4.75 m salary) at forward doesn't seem like a good move to me. If Dorion can't find a player to replace Watson at reasonable cost (either $s or assets, or both), I doubt if he's the GM to lead the Senators to any kind of success assuming that it somehow boils down to this kind of scenario. You mentioned three bad contracts and player assessments that Dorion made to acquire bad veteran players. Not sure that provides much comfort when you expect Dorion to find a better vet player than let's say White.Yes - that’s a fair price but it doesn’t guarantee we can get an equally effective player for another 4th.
Murray, Gud, Stepan etc are all good examples demonstrating the risk of using assets to acquire players. You would think a 4th for a Pacquette type player could replace Watson but in practice many of those may not work out.
We have good value in AW and I’d prefer to expose some of the negative value contacts we are accumulating. At worst we can throw $5+ at someone else to replace Dadonov or White types if they are selected.
IDK. Spending $5 m or over to keep Watson and replace White (and his $4.75 m salary) at forward doesn't seem like a good move to me. If Dorion can't find a player to replace Watson at reasonable cost (either $s or assets, or both), I doubt if he's the GM to lead the Senators to any kind of success assuming that it somehow boils down to this kind of scenario. You mentioned three bad contracts and player assessments that Dorion made to acquire bad veteran players. Not sure that provides much comfort when you expect Dorion to find a better vet player than let's say White.
No surprise as far as your last sentence is concerned. The idea you suggested has some merit, but would leave the team short at center. Of course, the anticipated response will be Pinto jumps into the lineup, but that's a lot of pressure on a young kid that has yet to play a single minute in the NHL. Pinto has potential and it might work, but I'm not sure instant success is a realistic expectation. Not sure there's much more to add to this subject to keep the discussion going.I wouldn’t replace White or Dadonov if we lost either - I’d play who ever we keep at 3RW and use the savings to improve 1-2C or defence.
We owe White nearly twice as much so I’d take my chances with Dadonov.
No surprise as far as your last sentence is concerned. The idea you suggested has some merit, but would leave the team short at center. Of course, the anticipated response will be Pinto jumps into the lineup, but that's a lot of pressure on a young kid that has yet to play a single minute in the NHL. Pinto has potential and it might work, but I'm not sure instant success is a realistic expectation.
White brings way more than 550K of additional value compared to Tierney.Yes, I agree with that. I’d be hopeful that 1-2 of of Tierney, Pinto, Stutzle, Paul, Greig, or Brown could help replace what White provides as a 2-4C but I recognize that each have their own obstacles.
I hope we get to see what Pinto and Brown look like soon.
Very reactionary comments. If Chabot's play drops off do you think we should get rid of him?All I know is we need to try to get rid of Murray's contract. Dadanov with only 2 years left is easier to stomach then $6 million for what we've seen this year and even if he's better next year, we have solid goalies in the systems and should run a 1a/1b situation.
I'd also like to see em get rid of Zaitsev. He's a third pairing defender on a competitive team and the $4.5 million can be better spent imo. Do what you can to get rid of Murray of Zaitsev
White brings way more than 550K of additional value compared to Tierney.