Just curious, A lot of scouts have Jarvis much higher and Holloway much lower. Why do you have the reverse?
It might be an over correction by me on Holloway due to Brady Tkachuk, but I've liked Holloway a lot before he went to the NCAA and saw a unique combo of size, skating power, shooting and playmaking. He's a rare type of player to get in this league and I think he can provide that 40-60 pt offense on the wing that retrieves pucks, stretches defenses, and is a load to handle on the forecheck. His offensive production took off in the NCAA when moved to the wing from center.. so I like that for him.
I am hot and cold on Jarvis. I would not be upset if we picked him at all, that list I posted has flip-flopped a hundred times. Can't argue with Jarvis' production but when I watch how he scores his points in junior, I do have some reticence about how that translates at the next level.
A lot of people see Jarvis as a play driver where he looks more like an opportunist to me.