Janmark is mentioned as probably their most likely piece of trade bait. Colorado were linked to him in free agency. He’s listed as a centre but hasn’t played there much. Definitely more of a winger.
Zadorov, defenseman: As recently as last month, Bowman made it clear he still sees Zadorov as part of the Blackhawks’ future, even referring to the big bruiser as Blackhawks “property” due to his restricted-free-agent status. But Zadorov’s next contract has to be a slight concern for the Blackhawks. His agent is probably already creating comparables and noticing Zadorov playing a larger role in Chicago than he did in Colorado. He’s playing a top-four role, around 20 minutes most nights. That means a pay increase. Would Bowman move on from Zadorov after just acquiring him? In the past, probably not. Now? We’ll see. The Blackhawks need to figure out whether Zadorov is a key piece of their future and whether he fits in their financial structure.
I’m still of the opinion that it would have been better to trade Graves and keep Zaddy. I wouldn’t even talk contract with him throughout the year. Qualify him and expose him to Seattle. If he’s not taken, deal with it then but I feel they’d definitely take him.From that Chicago article:
So glad we're not the ones dealing with that contract negotiation and probably having to give him a raise to avoid him walking in UFA in a year.
I’m still of the opinion that it would have been better to trade Graves and keep Zaddy. I wouldn’t even talk contract with him throughout the year. Qualify him and expose him to Seattle. If he’s not taken, deal with it then but I feel they’d definitely take him.
Time to hit up Bergivin now that he's getting desperate.Bowman is in love with big Z, I don't think he would've taken Graves back for Saad /w retention.
Are there any Montreal players that would be of interest other than Danault or possibly Lehkonen?Time to hit up Bergivin now that he's getting desperate.
Maybe he'll get stupid with a 1st round pick or Caufield.Are there any Montreal players that would be of interest other than Danault or possibly Lehkonen?
Are there any Montreal players that would be of interest other than Danault or possibly Lehkonen?
Drouin
You pushed the wrong emojies there. Should have been
There isn't a player that fits Bednar's system - where forwards are expected to backcheck incessantly, worse than Drouin. Big no on that.Nahh I low key want him
There isn't a player that fits Bednar's system - where forwards are expected to backcheck incessantly, worse than Drouin. Big no on that.
After posting that I low-key thought about deleting it and doing just that. But I decided against it so as to spare everyone 2 pages of Drouin talk. He's just not worth itI really thought you were gonna go along with me there haha.
Dim Jim is supposed to near the end. See if he will do a Chiarelli spite trade on the way out the door.
If we're raiding Nashville again, why not grab both Haula and Granlund?
Think about how much fun it would be to pick on @UncleRisto if an all-finnish 3rd line is the reason we lose in the playofffs though...Because they suck now.
Your mouth to the hockey gods’ ears.Horvat for Compher!
Think about how much fun it would be to pick on @UncleRisto if an all-finnish 3rd line is the reason we lose in the playofffs though...