OmNomNom
Taco is Love, Taco is Life
is there another hall we can trade for?The universe owes us a Larsson right?
is there another hall we can trade for?The universe owes us a Larsson right?
coming out of the tournament my thoughts are as follows in regards to the big 3 (smith, hughes, boqvist):
smith: he didnt perform at his best but im not really worried about what he did in this tournament as we all saw what he did last year in the preseason and main camp. i expect smith to make the team.
boqvist: he looked consistently the best of the three. not super impressed but he was alright. he has a shot at making the team it would seem.
hughes: probably the most underwhelming of the three. lots of fans are trying to cover up poor performance with “these games dont matter” or “hes not going 100%”. i dont like these excuses. if he isnt trying in these games that means that he feels entitled and inherently above the other players on the roster who are trying to make an impression which is obviously not good. if hughes had posted something like 3 ppg in the 3 games i feel like the tone would be pretty different and this 3 game stretch would be used to justify his draft position and hype. instead, because he performed below expectations people are using the “these games dont mean anything” line. as i said previously if these games were any indication of hughes’ current preparedness for the show, i would be wary about starting him in the NHL. he is still getting thrown around very easily, consistently blowing coverage in the d zone, plays a very loose and fluid style around the ice instead of being consistently conscious of good positioning. he is still playing a very junior hockey style. i really think hughes would benefit from playing a year in college against tougher opponents with a more structured game. he needs to develop physically and be able to consistently produce in the offensive zone. the way he is currently playing, i do not believe he will translate well to the NHL. if he were to play this year i dont see him as a center.
i do believe taking hughes was the correct pick on the draft floor btw. he has just underperformed in regards to his expectations so far (this can change obviously)
It's fun to guess at people's motives for posting some of the things they post. Why does someone think Hughes was bad when he was dominant in the offensive zone? Great question. Why do they think Hughes should play a year in college when at this point it isn't possible? A mystery to all.
There's some things Hughes is going to try that will not work. He's incredibly fast and incredibly shifty. He got pushed around a bit. He will be just fine in the NHL.
how can you possibly watch hughes’ 2 games and come away saying that he was dominant in any facet of the those games. also hockey is a 3 zone game not 1 zone, which is part of my problem with hughes here. he didn’t dominate offensively and played below average in pretty much every other area. my motives are to say how i feel on a board where people say how they feel. people can shoulder shrug all they want but its been shown time and time again that rushing a player to the show is not a good idea. im interested in the long term development of jack hughes. i dont care if that means he doesnt play in the show this year. forcing a potential franchise player into the show just because of precedent or some other reason is dumb. and i misspoke when i said college, in my old account i had sad numerous times during hughes’ draft season that he may be better off playing his d1 in college so i had that in mind.
I mean, you just didn't watch game 1. Hughes controlled basically every shift he was on the ice. He was again controlling shifts today. He didn't finish a lot of his chances and the chances he set up weren't often finished. He played in 2 games and in 2 games that will happen.
He will play in the NHL this year and be an above average player.
he's going to turn the puck over a shit ton in the NHL too. Players that go for high level plays don't have a 100% success rate with everything they try. Hall turns the puck over a lot too. Subban does as well. That's just how hockey isi did watch game one. im not sure how you define dominance but i would not classify hughes’ performance in any area of these games as dominant. and my point still stands, hockey is a 3 zone sport especially as a center. he was atrocious defensively and turned the puck over way way way too much. he couldve caused multiple goals against single handedly.
he's going to turn the puck over a **** ton in the NHL too. Players that go for high level plays don't have a 100% success rate with everything they try. Hall turns the puck over a lot too. That's just how hockey is
turning the puck over is okay as long as most of the time you have it you make responsible plays, or are able to convert. the issue that i have is that he is basically nonexistent/below average in all parts of the game that do not involve offense or breaking the puck out or into a zone (in the nhl). this is not a recipe for success for an undersized player who plays an extremely junior style game, especially at center. if he plays in the nhl there is a 99% chance in my opinion he plays on the wing which could turn out to be a problem as there may be a log jam there and we dont know whats going to happen with zacha.
i need to clarify that i acknowledge he can improve these parts of his game. in no way am i saying he is a finished product, i am simply saying that he does not currently look prepared for the rigors and play style of the NHL.
I honestly don't understand why you're so alarmed. The Devils have 3 weeks to evaluate him playing in an actual system with NHL caliber linemates and defensemen to make a decision. If he played poorly in camp/preseason, and the Devils announced that he made the team anyway, I'd understand it, but for now, this is just premature. These prospect tournaments are a chance for someone like Ludvig Larsson to shine, but they're also chaotic and sometimes guys won't perform like they would in a more structured game.
I want Hughes to be trying stuff out that doesn't work. He's exceptionally talented, so he will figure out what his limits are eventually, but if he's not testing NHL defenders with risky maneuvers then he won't reach his peak ability.
He's not going to arrive in the NHL as a finished product. I'm confident he will play center this year and that he will be an above-average player. I don't think he will be a star as an 18 year old.
I can't say I was really impressed by anyone outside of Boqvist from our top #3. I was happily surprised with the play of Bastian and to some degree, McLeod.
Let me point this out now, Hughes was the right choice at #1. With that said, he'll have to learn that the competition is now better and that he won't be able to dangle his way to the slot like he's been doing his entire career. His play away from the puck is something he'll have to work on because it's mediocre ATM. His speed gave him an advantage but now he'll have to play a more positional game because guys are much better and the game is much faster.
I can see him having some issues at the early stages of his NHL career but those are all things that can be learned pretty easily. The skills he does have can't be teaches and when he'll be able to mix both things, we'll have one of the best players in the league on our team.
It's fun to guess at people's motives for posting some of the things they post. Why does someone think Hughes was bad when he was dominant.
His game is not dangling to the slot. It's a high speed zone entry followed by a cut to the inside and a pass to a streaking winger or defenseman. If the defenseman steps up he takes it to the outside and looks for a pass.