Prospect Info: 2019-20 Prospects Thread Part II (CHL, NCAA, Junior A, Europe)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 29, 2003
52,425
36,940
Screw You Blaster
Visit site
PositionPlayerDraft2019 Rank2018 RankChange
RDCale Makar2017 #41 (96.7%)10
LDBowen Byram2019 #42 (98.1%)--
CAlex Newhook2019 #163 (60.0%)--
RDConor Timmins2017 #324 (57.8%)3-1
RWMartin Kaut2018 #165 (92.6%)2-3
CShane Bowers2017 #28 (TR)6 (76.6%)4-2
CVladislav Kamenev2014 #42 (TR)7 (52.1%)6-1
RDNicolas Meloche2015 #408 (46.5%)5-3
RDDrew Helleson2019 #479 (58.1%)--
RWNikolai Kovalenko2018 #17110 (51.5%)13+3
LWAJ Greer2015 #3911 (69.3%)8-3
CIgor Shyvrev2017 #12512 (26.8%)7-5
GAdam Werner2016 #13113 (29.1%)25+12
LWSampo Ranta2018 #7814 (41.7%)11-3
CLogan O'ConnorUndrafted15 (32.8%)HM+15
GJustus Annunen2018 #6416 (30.3%)12-4
RWNick Henry2017 #9417 (34.3%)16-1
LWCam Morrison2016 #4018 (39.1%)14-4
RWAlex Beaucage2019 #7819 (42.6%)--
LWTy LewisUndrafted20 (35.7%)9-11
LWTyler Weiss2018 #10921 (46.7%)10-11
CBrandon Saigeon2018 #14022 (40.0%)220
CMatthew Stienburg2019 #6323 (31.4%)--
RWSasha Mutala2019 #14024 (37.5%)--
GTrent Miner2019 #20225 (43.9%)--
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
HONORABLE MENTIONS

PositionPlayerDraft2019 Rank2018 RankChange
LDDanila Zhuravlyov2018 #146HM17-9
LDNick Leivermann2017 #187HM18-9
CLuka Burzan2019 #171HM--
GShamil Shmakov2018 #202HMHM0
RDNathan Clurman2016 #161HMHM0
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

McMetal

Writer of Wrongs
Sep 29, 2015
14,182
12,281
Regarding Pronman and skating from the last thread: I think he uses the word "elite" far too loosely there. McDavid is "elite". Makar is "elite". Putting Newhook in that category is just flat-out a gross exaggeration.

I think his skating is fine, and I've said before that it won't be a detriment to him in the NHL, but I also think it won't be a major advantage for him either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgf

Cousin Eddie

You Serious Clark?
Nov 3, 2006
40,152
37,330
Regarding Pronman and skating from the last thread: I think he uses the word "elite" far too loosely there. McDavid is "elite". Makar is "elite". Putting Newhook in that category is just flat-out a gross exaggeration.

I think his skating is fine, and I've said before that it won't be a detriment to him in the NHL, but I also think it won't be a major advantage for him either.
It’s his biggest advantage though.
You don’t have to think it’s elite, but if it’s not an advantage for him he won’t make it. It’s far and away his best attribute.
 

McMetal

Writer of Wrongs
Sep 29, 2015
14,182
12,281
It’s his biggest advantage though.
You don’t have to think it’s elite, but if it’s not an advantage for him he won’t make it. It’s far and away his best attribute.
I disagree. The thing I always came away with most impressed by in his draft year was his IQ and anticipation. He was always .5 seconds ahead of everybody else on the ice, and it was a huge part of what made him so successful, both in the BCHL and now in college, especially shorthanded. Matching that IQ with his natural skill level is what will make him successful in the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avsfan09

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
63,222
47,700
I wouldn't say this is his biggest advantage, but his hands and IQ are what is going to determine Newhook's success in the NHL. The gap he's enjoyed in skating is going to scream to a halt in the NHL. Seriously... nearly every NHL player is a great skater today. If skating is your only great skill, you can have success... it will be very limited though. Even if you assume absolutely elite skating, you're still limited. See Athanasiou/Grabner. His anticipation and hands to create space that will be what he lives or dies by in an impact role.
 
  • Like
Reactions: a mangy Meowth

avsfan09

Registered User
Dec 17, 2010
7,094
3,269
Nova Scotia
I disagree. The thing I always came away with most impressed by in his draft year was his IQ and anticipation. He was always .5 seconds ahead of everybody else on the ice, and it was a huge part of what made him so successful, both in the BCHL and now in college, especially shorthanded. Matching that IQ with his natural skill level is what will make him successful in the NHL.
I agree with this but I think he'll be an above average skater in the NHL.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
63,222
47,700
I agree with this but I think he'll be an above average skater in the NHL.

I’d rather not drag this debate into Jost 2.0, but at his size... above average isn’t good enough to be a top 6 center. He needs to be great... elite if he’s to be a 2 way guy.

When it comes to pure skating and taking nothing else into account. Jost is an above average skater. Maybe a touch less. The problem is he is pretty small and not strong on his skates... and with no real ability with the puck to create separation. If Jost was 6’2” and had his exact same skating, people would rave about how good it is and how for his size he’s a good skater. For his size being key in that. When a player is under 6’ or even 6’1” or 6’2” the margins start getting real slim. Can they still make great players? In (rare) instances, yeah. It just isn’t typical.

I’ll never say Newhook’s skating isn’t good enough to make the NHL or even be an impact NHL player. I’ll have concerns with him at center until I see how it translates to the highest level. He could be Point 2.0 with an extra 30lbs and I’ll end up his biggest fan... I just need to see it in the NHL.
 

Northern Avs Fan

Registered User
May 27, 2019
21,970
29,648
I’d rather not drag this debate into Jost 2.0, but at his size... above average isn’t good enough to be a top 6 center. He needs to be great... elite if he’s to be a 2 way guy.

When it comes to pure skating and taking nothing else into account. Jost is an above average skater. Maybe a touch less. The problem is he is pretty small and not strong on his skates... and with no real ability with the puck to create separation. If Jost was 6’2” and had his exact same skating, people would rave about how good it is and how for his size he’s a good skater. For his size being key in that. When a player is under 6’ or even 6’1” or 6’2” the margins start getting real slim. Can they still make great players? In (rare) instances, yeah. It just isn’t typical.

I’ll never say Newhook’s skating isn’t good enough to make the NHL or even be an impact NHL player. I’ll have concerns with him at center until I see how it translates to the highest level. He could be Point 2.0 with an extra 30lbs and I’ll end up his biggest fan... I just need to see it in the NHL.

It’s going to come down to how well he can think the game at NHL speed. I like his chances, but you can’t truly know until he’s in the league.
 

Tommy Shelby

Registered User
Feb 26, 2012
7,466
4,855
We just have to convince MacK, Sid and Bowers to invite a Newfie to their Cole 'Arbour offseason training club and he'll be set.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokecheque

avsfan09

Registered User
Dec 17, 2010
7,094
3,269
Nova Scotia
I’d rather not drag this debate into Jost 2.0, but at his size... above average isn’t good enough to be a top 6 center. He needs to be great... elite if he’s to be a 2 way guy.

When it comes to pure skating and taking nothing else into account. Jost is an above average skater. Maybe a touch less. The problem is he is pretty small and not strong on his skates... and with no real ability with the puck to create separation. If Jost was 6’2” and had his exact same skating, people would rave about how good it is and how for his size he’s a good skater. For his size being key in that. When a player is under 6’ or even 6’1” or 6’2” the margins start getting real slim. Can they still make great players? In (rare) instances, yeah. It just isn’t typical.

I’ll never say Newhook’s skating isn’t good enough to make the NHL or even be an impact NHL player. I’ll have concerns with him at center until I see how it translates to the highest level. He could be Point 2.0 with an extra 30lbs and I’ll end up his biggest fan... I just need to see it in the NHL.
His agility and edges are arguably great. Can he develop that area to compensate for being good/satisfactory in other areas like ov speed?
 

Richard88

John 3:16
Jun 29, 2019
19,181
20,819
PositionPlayerDraft2019 Rank2018 RankChange
RDCale Makar2017 #41 (96.7%)10
LDBowen Byram2019 #42 (98.1%)--
CAlex Newhook2019 #163 (60.0%)--
RDConor Timmins2017 #324 (57.8%)3-1
RWMartin Kaut2018 #165 (92.6%)2-3
CShane Bowers2017 #28 (TR)6 (76.6%)4-2
CVladislav Kamenev2014 #42 (TR)7 (52.1%)6-1
RDNicolas Meloche2015 #408 (46.5%)5-3
RDDrew Helleson2019 #479 (58.1%)--
RWNikolai Kovalenko2018 #17110 (51.5%)13+3
LWAJ Greer2015 #3911 (69.3%)8-3
CIgor Shyvrev2017 #12512 (26.8%)7-5
GAdam Werner2016 #13113 (29.1%)25+12
LWSampo Ranta2018 #7814 (41.7%)11-3
CLogan O'ConnorUndrafted15 (32.8%)HM+15
GJustus Annunen2018 #6416 (30.3%)12-4
RWNick Henry2017 #9417 (34.3%)16-1
LWCam Morrison2016 #4018 (39.1%)14-4
RWAlex Beaucage2019 #7819 (42.6%)--
LWTy LewisUndrafted20 (35.7%)9-11
LWTyler Weiss2018 #10921 (46.7%)10-11
CBrandon Saigeon2018 #14022 (40.0%)220
CMatthew Stienburg2019 #6323 (31.4%)--
RWSasha Mutala2019 #14024 (37.5%)--
GTrent Miner2019 #20225 (43.9%)--
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
HONORABLE MENTIONS

PositionPlayerDraft2019 Rank2018 RankChange
LDDanila Zhuravlyov2018 #146HM17-9
LDNick Leivermann2017 #187HM18-9
CLuka Burzan2019 #171HM--
GShamil Shmakov2018 #202HMHM0
RDNathan Clurman2016 #161HMHM0
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Top 5 is still very much the same, but there's a strong case for Zhuravlylov, Beaucage, Annunen, and Mutala to move into (or at least closer to) the Top 10 as well.
 

McMetal

Writer of Wrongs
Sep 29, 2015
14,182
12,281
Top 5 is still very much the same, but there's a strong case for Zhuravlylov, Beaucage, Annunen, and Mutala to move into (or at least closer to) the Top 10 as well.
Well, Makar and Kamenev will likely graduate from the pool (Makar needs 5 more games, Kam needs 10), and Meloche is no longer with the org, so that's three top 10 spots opening up, with the possibility that another prospect in there goes at the deadline. I expect little movement at the very top, but there will be a lot of shuffling in the 5-12 range for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard88

RockyMtnRedhawk

Registered User
Feb 25, 2014
2,995
2,955
Denver
I posted my mid-season top 10 in this thread...

Your Team's Top 10 Prospects

I'll play along...

:avs

1. Bowen Byram
2. Alex Newhook
3. Conor Timmins
4. Shane Bowers
5. Martin Kaut
6. Justus Annunen
7. Drew Helleson
8: Alex Beaucage
9. Nikolai Kovalenko
10: Sampo Ranta

Just missed the cut: Danila Zhuravlyov, Adam Werner, and Sasha Mutala


2 and 3 are very close for a lot of Avs fans, and I think 7-10 are pretty interchangeable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gatorbait19

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
63,222
47,700
His agility and edges are arguably great. Can he develop that area to compensate for being good/satisfactory in other areas like ov speed?

I've spoken at length on my thoughts on skating development. Newhook's technical skating is about as good as it gets. I really only see a slight heel kick as my only gripe in that area. Along with that, he's as big as he should ever get (though he will bulk up like all young NHL players). I personally don't see his skating having much headroom. Maybe some, but the day he breaks into the NHL I think he will be at 98% of what he can be as a NHL skater. If he bulks up, his ability might actually take a hit in the first couple years until he sees the light like MacKinnon did.
 

RockyMtnRedhawk

Registered User
Feb 25, 2014
2,995
2,955
Denver
Needs more LOC :nod:

Yeah, I realized I left him out. He's kinda the forgotten prospect because he doesn't have the draft pedigree. That said. I still think he's just outside the top 10. He's been good, but he hasn't improved on last season enough in my opinion to move him way up. I've only seen a few Eagles games in person this year though.
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
25,899
9,878
Michigan
I've spoken at length on my thoughts on skating development. Newhook's technical skating is about as good as it gets. I really only see a slight heel kick as my only gripe in that area. Along with that, he's as big as he should ever get (though he will bulk up like all young NHL players). I personally don't see his skating having much headroom. Maybe some, but the day he breaks into the NHL I think he will be at 98% of what he can be as a NHL skater. If he bulks up, his ability might actually take a hit in the first couple years until he sees the light like MacKinnon did.

Didn't Duchene have something of a off season change and focus on his core and legs? It wasn't so much bulking up, but it helped him in the corners while getting checked quite a bit.

I find it interesting players focus so much on bulking up still, and then eventually start to target certain areas later.

Is it just access to higher quality trainers?

Then you have the Avs literally telling guys like Jost and Girard to bulk up.
 

henchman21

Mr. Meeseeks
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2012
63,222
47,700
Didn't Duchene have something of a off season change and focus on his core and legs? It wasn't so much bulking up, but it helped him in the corners while getting checked quite a bit.

I find it interesting players focus so much on bulking up still, and then eventually start to target certain areas later.

Is it just access to higher quality trainers?

Then you have the Avs literally telling guys like Jost and Girard to bulk up.

I'm pretty sure 28 teams tell their players to bulk up, Avs included. Just an old school hockey thought that weight = strong. I use him as the example all the time, but I'd take Point at his 5'10" (lol) 165lbs over all but about 5-7 centers in the league. Tampa knows his frame can't support weight and that skating is the key to his game... so he shouldn't artificially bulk up to 185 and take away his key advantage to be 'stronger.'
 

CobraAcesS

De Opresso Liber
Sponsor
Jul 20, 2011
25,899
9,878
Michigan
I'm pretty sure 28 teams tell their players to bulk up, Avs included. Just an old school hockey thought that weight = strong. I use him as the example all the time, but I'd take Point at his 5'10" (lol) 165lbs over all but about 5-7 centers in the league. Tampa knows his frame can't support weight and that skating is the key to his game... so he shouldn't artificially bulk up to 185 and take away his key advantage to be 'stronger.'

More muscle requires more oxygen as well. I've seen soldiers bulk up fast, and their ability to keep up disappears just as fast lol.

It's a little funny, especially seeing as pro sports are supposed to be cutting edge in fitness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad