Prospect Info: 2017 CFHF Prospect Rankings: #4

Status
Not open for further replies.

FlamerForLife

Mon Seanahan
May 22, 2015
4,702
1,926
Calgary
1. Mark Jankowski (50.00%)
2. Tyler Parsons (57.50%)
3. Rasmus Andersson (47.73%)

Run-off rules (copied from Angelsmith's thread last year):
• If first and second place are separated by a number of votes less than or equal to the number of votes for third place, a run-off vote will take place.
• If first and third are separated by a number of votes less than the number of all other votes, a three-way run-off vote will take place.
• Rules are subject to change due to common sense at all times.
 

Flames Fanatic

Mediocre
Aug 14, 2008
13,362
2,906
Cochrane
@Skobel from the last thread, the difference between Valimaki's ceiling and Kylington's isn't that different though. Not compared to say Jankowski and Hathaway.
 

Mr Snrub

I like the way Snrub thinks!
Oct 12, 2016
5,713
2,410
It's gonna be a landslide for Valimaki but I'm voting Dube.
 

Skobel24

#Ignited
May 23, 2008
16,789
920
Winnipeg
@Skobel from the last thread, the difference between Valimaki's ceiling and Kylington's isn't that different though. Not compared to say Jankowski and Hathaway.

The point remains, there is no criteria for this voting. Some posters will vote based on potential. Some may view 'safer' prospects higher than 'boom/bust' ones. If you think Valimaki is more valuable than Kylington, that's completely reasonable. However, so is arguing Kylingtons potential.

IMO: after Jankowski, there is an argument that could be made for about 7 or so guys on that list for #2 and on (Andersson, Kylington, Parsons, Gillies, Valimaki, Fox, Dube).
 
Last edited:

Johnny Hoxville

The Return of a Legend
Jul 15, 2006
37,549
9,343
Calgary
Jusso, the Valimakian one.

tumblr_mdxf4qbTyo1r7igquo1_400.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad