rangerssharks414
Registered User
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/2017-18-sharks-roster-discussion-ii.2433229/
Old thread is above
Continue.
Old thread is above
Continue.
Their performance as a line has been pretty good relative to the team.
They are receiving sub 900 sv on ice though which tanks their gf%
Hertl is boosted big time scoring wise by cooch where cooch sees the puck a lot more with hertl.
I think hertl would generate chances regardless, however, with couture youll see a higher conversion rate.
An interesting experiment would be to get kane on their line but there isnt enough games to glean anything from it.
But they are a good line.
I don't think Couture can keep up his production without someone like Hertl to help him keep possession as well as he does. At least not long term. You could probably do Couture with Thornton when he returns although Thornton is probably going to want someone like Pavelski on his wing as well to be one of his primary targets for his passes. We'll see. There's still a while until that happens and until then, Hertl and Couture together is probably their best option.
I'd watch the hell out of a Couture-Thornton-Meier line.
Kane-Pavs-Donskoi
Couture-Thornton-Meier
Hertl-Tierney-Labanc
Boedker-Fehr-Hansen
4th line is called "Two Fehr Danes"
Pavelski has been fine at center so far. If that continues I wouldn't split it up.
I'd watch the hell out of a Couture-Thornton-Meier line.
Kane-Pavs-Donskoi
Couture-Thornton-Meier
Hertl-Tierney-Labanc
Boedker-Fehr-Hansen
4th line is called "Two Fehr Danes"
Pavelski has been fine at center so far. If that continues I wouldn't split it up.
Yah. I don't think the Pavs line can match against those guys. But, if we use Hertl-Jumbo-Couture as the other line, I am pretty sure they could match up against Kopitar or Getzlaf lines.I have major doubts that Pavelski centering his own line would hold up against a Kopitar line or a Getzlaf line in the playoffs.
Yah. I don't think the Pavs line can match against those guys. But, if we use Hertl-Jumbo-Couture as the other line, I am pretty sure they could match up against Kopitar or Getzlaf lines.
Yah. I don't think the Pavs line can match against those guys. But, if we use Hertl-Jumbo-Couture as the other line, I am pretty sure they could match up against Kopitar or Getzlaf lines.
Possibly but then would a Pavelski line hold up against a Pearson-Carter-Toffoli line or a Cogliano-Kesler-Silfverberg line? Maybe against the Ducks but doubtful against the Kings.
I guess we could double shift the thornton line thenPossibly but then would a Pavelski line hold up against a Pearson-Carter-Toffoli line or a Cogliano-Kesler-Silfverberg line? Maybe against the Ducks but doubtful against the Kings.
I find it odd Deboer doesn't want the players to see what they did wrong/could have done differently after a shift by using the tablets. (from Pete DeBoer doesn't want Sharks players on iPads on bench )
Kane-Pavelski-Donskoi would eat both of those with the way that they're playing right now.
Fine, "Two Good Danes" it is thenI think id put Goodrow at C and have Fehr as the 13th, but i like the rest of the lineup
I also think your line up is more likely for PDB
I find it odd Deboer doesn't want the players to see what they did wrong/could have done differently after a shift by using the tablets. (from Pete DeBoer doesn't want Sharks players on iPads on bench )
Which center besides hertl could out possess kopitar or getz?
Besides deboer will match tierney against them anyway.
I mean... Joe Thornton...
For real tho. Couture-Thornton-Hertl needs to happen.