He was a D that switched to LW and flourished.
Skating in his game.
Another 19 year old prospect.
Intriguing.
Almost a backwards Jake Gardiner (who moved from forward to defense and flourished), another Minnesota-native.
He was a D that switched to LW and flourished.
Skating in his game.
Another 19 year old prospect.
He was a D that switched to LW and flourished.
Skating in his game.
Another 19 year old prospect.
Sorry. NHL site had 'Jonathan Walker'.
Wait so what is it? Jonathan or Jack?
Maybe the Leafs are picking guys to stash on the Marlies
Brooks, Bobylev and Walker can replace the Marlies who are moving on
So should I change the title to LW?
I am confused by this draft strategy, we have a ton of players coming up through the system, mostly domestic so they don't have anywhere to go but the Marlies or the ECHL, and we are adding more players that are in that circumstance as well, because they are older already when we are drafting them (Brooks, Bobylyov, Walker). How do we sign all of these guys, wouldn't it have been a better strategy to stash more NCAA (Woll & Greenaway) and european (Grundstrom) players
I think so. Maybe Hunter will clarify on when he does his post draft interview.
But I believe he's a LW going forward since he flourished in that role.
I think so. Maybe Hunter will clarify on when he does his post draft interview.
But I believe he's a LW going forward since he flourished in that role.
how many overagers?
Look like a high risk / high reward kind? do not know much about him
So should I change the title to LW?