No one has ever confirmed it, but the belief last year was Bruce Boudreau wanted to start Frederik Andersen right away in last year’s playoff series versus Nashville, only to be overruled. Gibson got the first two games.
Maharaj on Gibson: “He’s maybe the most misunderstood goaltender I've ever encountered. Reminds me of Ray Emery. What makes them great goaltenders doesn't always translate to people. John comes across as aloof or standoffish, but he’s got a wicked sense of humour. He’s engaging, hilariously funny. People misread him.”
“I’ve got[ten] a lot of questions [about the long layoff],” he said. “It’s like I didn’t forget how to play, right? Just had an injury. Came back a little too soon the first time. Now everything’s pretty good.”
Asked if he feels there’s a competition between him and Bernier for the Game 1 start, Gibson said, “You’d have to ask Randy what he thinks. I’ve been here for the whole year. I got hurt for a month.”
It's pretty hard to believe that Murray - and I don't think there's anyone else who would be in the position to do so - would overrule BB on such a clear-cut coaching decision. Who knows, though.
His reputation is hands-off lineup decisions. And Friedman doesn't say who supposedly overruled it. Maybe it was medical staff, Freddy was recently back from injury. Very little content in that update, but I wanted to acknowledge it since I've been pretty savage to BB about it.
His reputation is hands-off lineup decisions. And Friedman doesn't say who supposedly overruled it. Maybe it was medical staff, Freddy was recently back from injury. Very little content in that update, but I wanted to acknowledge it since I've been pretty savage to BB about it.
Ritchie will have a hearing today at the NHL Player Safety due to the Rozsival case. This is a joke...
To be honest, I don't think it is. SJ's Haley basically did the same thing a week or so ago (while answering for a hit on himself rather than a teammate) and it got him a game. Realistically, Ritchie deserves a game, as well. It wasn't a super-cheap play on Perry; I understand why Ritchie did it and like that he wanted to send that message, but it's not proportional to a very standard offense that had already been called.
Obviously, if we're measuring it by the non-hearing for Giordano, most hearings that take place are a joke. But I think it's more reasonable saying the Giordano decision was a joke, while this one falls in line with what is out there.
I don't see how anything he said makes him sound like a D-bag. He's just more candid than most.
If it's more than that, you bet I'll be outraged, as well. That would indeed be a complete joke after the Haley decision. It should be lighter, if anything, but I don't know if they're doing hearings for fines.You are right. It was a dump and unnecessary move by Ritchie, he deserves a game. (I hope it will be only one game).
It definitely is annoying to no end. The injustice over the Giordano case will definitely stick with us for a while. Hopefully the guys on the ice can channel it into something positive, like they did out on the ice that night, for the most part.But it's so annoying when your team is always suffering when the league should judge. Especially after Giordano's "clean" knee-to-knee hit.
To be honest, I don't think it is. SJ's Haley basically did the same thing a week or so ago (while answering for a hit on himself rather than a teammate) and it got him a game. Realistically, Ritchie deserves a game, as well. It wasn't a super-cheap play on Perry; I understand why Ritchie did it and like that he wanted to send that message, but it's not proportional to a very standard offense that had already been called.
Obviously, if we're measuring it by the non-hearing for Giordano, most hearings that take place are a joke. But I think it's more reasonable saying the Giordano decision was a joke, while this one falls in line with what is out there.
I agree on both accounts. Ritchie thought Rozsival would drop the gloves, but didn't. He was definitely overzealous and it will likely cost him at least 1 game. Thought the same thing when I saw it happen last night, so I wasn't surprised when I saw the notice he was having a hearing... Still can't get over how Giordano didn't receive a hearing on Fowler though. Boggles the mind when Giordano would have been suspended indefinitely if it was McJesus or Crybaby on the receiving end of the hit.
Ritchie is a 21 year old kid who scored 14 goals and almost 30 points this year. He has made great strides this year. No way he is going to the AHL anytime soon.
He has had some ups and downs this year but I would call this year an absolute success for him.
You mean Sidney Criesby?I agree on both accounts. Ritchie thought Rozsival would drop the gloves, but didn't. He was definitely overzealous and it will likely cost him at least 1 game. Thought the same thing when I saw it happen last night, so I wasn't surprised when I saw the notice he was having a hearing... Still can't get over how Giordano didn't receive a hearing on Fowler though. Boggles the mind when Giordano would have been suspended indefinitely if it was McJesus or Crybaby on the receiving end of the hit.
How do defencemen get credited with faceoff wins on NHL.com? Lindholm is currently 100%.
Center gets thrown out of the dot in OT. It was either the Jets or Oilers game last week I remember Lindholm taking a faceoff in OT.
I didn't think that a defenceman taking the draw was possible. I always thought you had to swap the winger in instead.
Maybe it was a 5-on-3 situation where there's a centerman and two defensemen on the ice on the PK. The center gets kicked out and one of the defensemen needed to step in.