guymez
The Seldom Seen Kid
- Mar 3, 2004
- 33,099
- 12,895
This is without a doubt the most radically optimistic prediction I have seen yet.
http://thehockeywriters.com/where-will-the-oilers-finish-in-2015-16/
This I agree with (aside from the analytics) and have said as much over the last few months. I think the points gap is smaller than the final standings illustrated and bad luck was a factor.
That said I think he is reading to much into the possession stats because Eakins instructions misused advanced stats. It wasn't a natural progression of maturity in terms of better systems play based on what I witnessed.
The Eakins factor held this team back IMO...a full year of Nelson and better goaltending and better injury luck would have probably meant at lest 10-15 more points.
I most definitely do not agree with the writers take on the defence.
Wow...overall an awful lot has to go right for this prediction to come to fruition.
With the lineup as it stands right now I cant bring myself to imagine even in my wildest dreams that they would win the Western Conference.
I dont think that even the most optimistic HF'er would suggest this writers prediction is a possibility.
Thoughts?
http://thehockeywriters.com/where-will-the-oilers-finish-in-2015-16/
Besides bad luck and bad goaltending, the Oilers entered last season without a single top-pairing defenseman or NHL calibre goalie. They lost their best player – Taylor Hall – for 30 games and dressed (probably) the worst defense in the NHL. They for sure had the worst goalies.
Even with all that, they still should have won more games than they did – especially early when the analytics were very strong and they just couldn’t buy a win. In the end, I’m not making excuses for how the Oilers performed last season, but just pointing out that they should have been slightly better than they were and that the gap between last year and the Playoffs is smaller than it appears.
This I agree with (aside from the analytics) and have said as much over the last few months. I think the points gap is smaller than the final standings illustrated and bad luck was a factor.
That said I think he is reading to much into the possession stats because Eakins instructions misused advanced stats. It wasn't a natural progression of maturity in terms of better systems play based on what I witnessed.
The Eakins factor held this team back IMO...a full year of Nelson and better goaltending and better injury luck would have probably meant at lest 10-15 more points.
With Sekera, Klefbom, Nurse and Schultz, the Oilers have a high-powered possession savvy D with size, skill, balance and talent.
I most definitely do not agree with the writers take on the defence.
In the upcoming season they are going to be the surprise of the NHL, be the most fun team to watch, score the most goals and win the Western Conference.
I really do believe that, and if I wanted to troll anyone, I would have put it in the title. Here’s why they’re going to be so good:
Wow...overall an awful lot has to go right for this prediction to come to fruition.
With the lineup as it stands right now I cant bring myself to imagine even in my wildest dreams that they would win the Western Conference.
I dont think that even the most optimistic HF'er would suggest this writers prediction is a possibility.
Thoughts?
Last edited: