Lol, this is getting ridiculous. Really doubt this is true. And even if it was that shows just how insecure the people around Kral and Lener are. They are clearly afraid now and trying Zacha to look as bad as possible.
I don't find it ridiculous. Zacha Sr. wasn't "dôvernÃk" or someone like that, who might have cooperated with ŠtB unconsciously. He was "rozviedčik", which means he was almost on the top of the pyramide, so I find it quite "odd" (and I'm veeery polite) that he is talking about morale and stuff like that. And I can't believe how you both are almost blind and see just one color, like everything which is not in favor of Zacha Sr., is not true. In my opinion it's almost unbeatable evidence against Zacha, which hugely destroys his reputation at least in my eyes.
But besides that, when I take away these facts, Zacha's article is full of half-truth and assumptions, whose intention is to set his son to the position of martyr (like nametemplate during mock game
). In my point of view, only two points out of whole article are relevant. First of all, the ban of public on the mock game between U19 and U20 NT. That's ridiculous and it just creates space for these types of rumors. Secondly, calling-up Zbořil, ChlapÃk and Jenyš. Force them to fly across the half of the Earth just due to attendance on three practices is almost inhuman.
Přerost is very weak coach, no question, but what Zacha Sr. makes, that's illustration of overreaction. He's in position of parent, therefore he should abstain of criticizing the depth chart of the team, where his son plays, because there is always a relevant effect of his personal bias. Zacha was far away from being the best player on the ice, not counting the game against Slovakia. You might disagree that it was the only game where he was playing in 2nd line, that's true, but at the same time, he's projected 1st round pick and he should have been the player, that was able to lead his line towards the better performance (like e.g. his peer Aho in Finnish team). Since he failed to do that, there is no surprise he fell down in post-WJC draft rankings.
As for the ban on writing about Zacha prior the WJC. Absolutely logical choice. Last year he was almost in every single media before the WJC. Yeah, it's rare to see the U17 eligible player on WJC, but you know what? In 2013 Vrana did same, and there was anything but hype like in Zacha's case. And everybody out of you has to admit, that Zacha did not deserve such a huge medialization considering his position within the team prior to 2014 WJC. On the other hand, his story and upbringing is a great story for journalist, so I partly understand that hype.
I don't want to defend ČSLH or Přerost. Přerost should have been fired long time ago, but Zacha Sr. is very experienced manipulator and he should not be considered as a sample of hope in Czech hockey. As always, I believe that truth lies somewhere between both sides. In my opinion closer to Czech IHF.
P.S.: On the first hand, you're not criticizing "ad hominem" behaviour of Zacha Sr. against Přerost, on the other hand, when there is evidence almost beyond all doubt, that he was a member of ŠtB, which should be 25 years after fall of communism considered as "ad hominem" argument (although I don't agree with this attitude), you're suddenly defending Zacha Sr and yelling that everybody from Czech IHF is afraid of him and therefore they came up with this information (even though you do not have any evidence, that Czech IHF came up with this). I find it little bit hypocritical.