McDavid played the amount he should of, he was not very dangerous overall in this tournament.
Yeah they could of brought a few different players, but I'm not so sure that would of made a difference. I don't know what the problem was, these tournaments are tricky because they're so short. Hockey Canada definitely needs to really look at and examine our game and the selection process.
McDavid played the amount he should of, he was not very dangerous overall in this tournament.
Yeah they could of brought a few different players, but I'm not so sure that would of made a difference. I don't know what the problem was, these tournaments are tricky because they're so short. Hockey Canada definitely needs to really look at and examine our game and the selection process.
Do I ever wish we took Terravianen when we had the chance. In my mind as of right now
Terravainen> Jankowski+Seiloff
He is a gifted player, he may be a little smaller but very good.
The Swedes looked to us as a way to improve their program several years ago, and they borrowed some ideas and added some of their own. It's time for Hockey Canada to put aside their ego and look at whatever Sweden has been doing systematically through their junior leagues as the talent they have produced in the last 5 years has been staggering.
Do I ever wish we took Terravianen when we had the chance. In my mind as of right now
Terravainen> Jankowski+Seiloff
He is a gifted player, he may be a little smaller but very good.
Was thinking that today too.
This kid's looked incredible at this tournament.
It's ****ed, even more so, when the two people Calgary directly passed on (keeping in mind, our 'select the BPA' was being used then) was TT and Maatta. One guy has played an incredible WJC tournament this year, and is looking right at home playing with men in Finland, and the other passed on the WJC tournament because he is playing incredibly important minutes for the Pens.
Top 4 D-man at 19 already holding down an NHL job. High skilled, tournament leading Finn who is looking to be a very strong top 6 player in the league within the next couple years... and we have, instead, a guy who can't hold down a top line in the NCAA.
Think it's definitely more ****ed with Maatta, because not only could we have drafted him, but we could have also drafted Sieloff.
I think a lot of the frustration stems from the fact that our fan base expects production from him. He is a large player who is supposed, according to our organization, to be tremendously skilled. So why aren't we seeing more production from him. While I know he is a project, the pressure and expectations were placed on him by our GM when he called him the best player to come out of the draft in 10 years. I think people being mad at that pick, is very warranted as of right now.At the same time, though, this is not unexpected with Jankowski. If he develops the way that our management believed he will, then nobody will care what he was doing at age 19. He was labelled as a late bloomer right from the start. Why bother comparing him now? If he busts, we won't know for a couple of years, which of course is half of the frustration with fans.
At the same time, though, this is not unexpected with Jankowski. If he develops the way that our management believed he will, then nobody will care what he was doing at age 19. He was labelled as a late bloomer right from the start. Why bother comparing him now? If he busts, we won't know for a couple of years, which of course is half of the frustration with fans.
I'm not sure why everyone insists on complaining forever about the Jankowski pick. It's picked, he's ours get over it.
Also I noticed Janko deleted his twitter, I have this horrible feeling that our fan base has harassed him because of their obsession over what ifs and caused him to deleted it.
yep and could cost us a good prospectThat would be a shame. People can be stupid with their use of tags on Facebook and Twitter.