Speculation: 2013/2014 Trade Speculation (All Players) | Part VII |

Status
Not open for further replies.

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,602
18,771
Eakins strikes me as the type of dude who gives motivational self help seminars and is real intense about virtually everything. I'm wondering if his shtick is something young kids buy into but something more mature, less influenced players kind of shake there head at after a while.

I hate to put the guy down, I may be off base too. Whatever. Just calling it as I see it.

Regardless, we have D, they need D. I think Yakupov is worth the risk. Get him under the wing of someone like Malkin. Kid needs a mentor, not coach Dr. Phil.

I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with this. Yakupov softer style of play doesn't quite fit the Penguins system. Nor is that what we need on Malkin's wing. Unless Yakupov and Malkin show such amazing chemistry that you can give Neal to Sid. Even in that case we still need a third wheel.

I would never do a 1:1 trade for Yakupov and Letang. Established, elite #1 PMD vs a recent #1 overall who's been getting scratched on the worst team in the league. Tough to determine what else would make the deal equal. Eberle for Letang makes more sense.

If I'm Edmonton I'd make two quantity for quality trades with Eberle and Yakupov. Each of those guys can bring back a good 2nd line wing and a dman. Maybe even a prospect. If you can get back a good wing, a capable 3C, and 2 solid dmen...they would be much better off .

Examples from the Trade Board (not advocating or saying they are realistic, just examples):

Eberle

for

Abdelkader, Justin
Mantha, Anthony
2014 2nd round pick

and

Yakupov Hemsky and Smid to Philadelphia for Schenn Simmonds and Coburn

Problem is they don't view something like that as progress. They'd rather have their 4 stars and 0 Cups.
 

BHD

Vejmelka for Vezina
Dec 27, 2009
38,216
16,653
Moncton, NB
While I'm more open to the thought of Hemsky than I once was, I don't think he is what the team needs. The top 6 needs a player who could be strong on the forechecking and take the puck to the net with authority. I would be stoked to see one of Winnipeg's wingers (Kane, Ladd, or Wheeler) in a Pens jersey, but I don't think it will happen. The price is likely too high, but... Shero is not afraid to make big trades, and things can change.
 

Freeptop

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
2,346
1,217
Pittsburgh, PA
5vtvi.jpg

I find it rather amusing that when Bylsma decided to try out Engelland at forward, there was a fair amount of complaints around here about how bad of a coach Bylsma was to try that in the first place. Now that Engelland has looked good at forward, people complain that Bylsma wouldn't possibly continue to use him there... even though Bylsma immediately slid Engelland back to forward at the first opportunity to do so (given that they wanted to give Maatta a game off after some rough games).

At this point, the hyperbole about how bad of a coach Bylsma is has reached self-parody :lol:
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,590
1,269
Montreal, QC
I wouldn't deal Letang for Yakupov straight up either, but I'm quite confident in saying Edmonton would offer us more than Yakupov for Letang. They're a train wreck right now.

Eberle would be great, as well. Hall is untouchable, in all likelihood. Ditto the Nuge. Hemsky I wouldn't touch. No more Jussi Jokinen's, please.
 

Jag68Sid87

Sullivan gots to go!
Oct 1, 2003
35,590
1,269
Montreal, QC
I find it rather amusing that when Bylsma decided to try out Engelland at forward, there was a fair amount of complaints around here about how bad of a coach Bylsma was to try that in the first place. Now that Engelland has looked good at forward, people complain that Bylsma wouldn't possibly continue to use him there... even though Bylsma immediately slid Engelland back to forward at the first opportunity to do so (given that they wanted to give Maatta a game off after some rough games).

At this point, the hyperbole about how bad of a coach Bylsma is has reached self-parody :lol:

Engelland was well down the list of Bylsma muck-ups. Not hyberbole, just some people need better glasses to see.
 

eXile59

Shirts on.
Jan 2, 2009
18,221
1
PA
I find it rather amusing that when Bylsma decided to try out Engelland at forward, there was a fair amount of complaints around here about how bad of a coach Bylsma was to try that in the first place. Now that Engelland has looked good at forward, people complain that Bylsma wouldn't possibly continue to use him there... even though Bylsma immediately slid Engelland back to forward at the first opportunity to do so (given that they wanted to give Maatta a game off after some rough games).

At this point, the hyperbole about how bad of a coach Bylsma is has reached self-parody :lol:

Maybe the 17th opportunity. We are constantly benching young good d-men & our forwards even when healthy are sub par in the bottom 6. As soon as it became apparent Engelland was better at forward that's where he should have been playing.
 

IcedCapp

Registered User
Aug 7, 2009
35,933
11,544
I find it rather amusing that when Bylsma decided to try out Engelland at forward, there was a fair amount of complaints around here about how bad of a coach Bylsma was to try that in the first place. Now that Engelland has looked good at forward, people complain that Bylsma wouldn't possibly continue to use him there... even though Bylsma immediately slid Engelland back to forward at the first opportunity to do so (given that they wanted to give Maatta a game off after some rough games).

At this point, the hyperbole about how bad of a coach Bylsma is has reached self-parody :lol:

I will agree with your point and concede that you're 100% right.

As soon as you show me how this was his first opportunity to move him back.

I'll wait.
 

Ragamuffin Gunner

Lost in the Flood
Aug 15, 2008
34,877
7,089
Boston
I find it rather amusing that when Bylsma decided to try out Engelland at forward, there was a fair amount of complaints around here about how bad of a coach Bylsma was to try that in the first place. Now that Engelland has looked good at forward, people complain that Bylsma wouldn't possibly continue to use him there... even though Bylsma immediately slid Engelland back to forward at the first opportunity to do so (given that they wanted to give Maatta a game off after some rough games).

At this point, the hyperbole about how bad of a coach Bylsma is has reached self-parody :lol:

People were mad that he was playing over Menga, not that he was playing at all.

And DB should have put him there instead of scratching Olli and Des so this is not the "first opportunity to slide him back there".
 

Ugene Magic

EVIL LAUGH
Oct 17, 2008
54,351
18,776
Pittsburgh
People were mad that he was playing over Menga, not that he was playing at all.

And DB should have put him there instead of scratching Olli and Des so this is not the "first opportunity to slide him back there".

Maatta wasn't scratched just to be scratched, he was scratched because he has played more hockey in such a short amount of time ever in his career. I could argue he could use a week more away from the game to recharge the batteries. This is not a punishment it's a necessity. Despres has looked great coming in fresh.

Then a couple bodies come back. Orpik/Scuderi.

Not everything DB does is him out to getting the young defenders, holding them back.
 

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,023
67,649
Pittsburgh
For no rumors, we are just FIRING through these threads. :laugh: I cannot wait til the first time Eklund or TIOPS throws us a bone for hits. Mega-hits.

It's about time to get a new thread started, eh?
 

Michael8771*

Guest
For no rumors, we are just FIRING through these threads. :laugh: I cannot wait til the first time Eklund or TIOPS throws us a bone for hits. Mega-hits.

It's about time to get a new thread started, eh?
Actually, both Eklund and TIOPS did mention the Pens looking at players. Moulson and the Pens per exlund, TIOPS linked us with the Jets.


http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklu...ooking-for-Help-Brodeur-Market-Coming/1/56914

http://insidepittsburghsports.com/s...nder-kane-can-be-had-ladd-a-top-target/62734/

There you go.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,544
22,068
Pittsburgh
Maatta wasn't scratched just to be scratched, he was scratched because he has played more hockey in such a short amount of time ever in his career. I could argue he could use a week more away from the game to recharge the batteries. This is not a punishment it's a necessity. Despres has looked great coming in fresh.

Then a couple bodies come back. Orpik/Scuderi.

Not everything DB does is him out to getting the young defenders, holding them back.

If it wasn't going to cause Dumoulin to play, Engelland should have been playing forward. If Bortuzzo was sitting, we were making a mistake playing Engelland on defense.
 

JTG

Registered User
Sep 30, 2007
50,480
5,760
Copying last page of old thread is a solid move.
 

cassius

Registered User
Jul 23, 2004
13,560
706
I wouldn't deal Letang for Yakupov straight up either, but I'm quite confident in saying Edmonton would offer us more than Yakupov for Letang. They're a train wreck right now.

Eberle would be great, as well. Hall is untouchable, in all likelihood. Ditto the Nuge. Hemsky I wouldn't touch. No more Jussi Jokinen's, please.

Agreed.

I wouldn't even consider trading Letang for Yakupov.. it's just far too risky given how little Yakupov has accomplished so far at the NHL level. Just way too many question marks.

As far as Edmonton, the only deal I could see happening would be centering around Hall. The guy is a very promising young player with upside.

I would pass on Eberle too.. not because he isn't a great player, but we have plenty of undersized "perimeter" guys as it is.
 

JimmyTwoTimes

Registered User
Apr 13, 2010
19,958
5,281
People are still talking about trading Letang? I was all for it, but there's zero chance it happens. Even if they wanted to they don't have the guts to do something that big. Maybe 3-4 years from now but it's certainly not happening anytime soon no matter how much sense it makes. So all we can do now is hope he stays healthy and gets back to playing at an elite level.
 

cassius

Registered User
Jul 23, 2004
13,560
706
People are still talking about trading Letang? I was all for it, but there's zero chance it happens. Even if they wanted to they don't have the guts to do something that big. Maybe 3-4 years from now but it's certainly not happening anytime soon no matter how much sense it makes. So all we can do now is hope he stays healthy and gets back to playing at an elite level.

With the amount he's getting paid and how poorly he's played (not only this season but the past 2 post-seasons), I think you have to at least consider it! Especially given the Dupuis injury.

The thing that scares me about Letang is that you never know what you're getting with him. He is just so consistent. Typically, a player who is making $7M+ a year.. you know what you're getting with them night in and night out. However, with Letang, the consistency just isn't there.
 

Speaking Moistly

What a terrible image.
Feb 19, 2013
39,728
7,402
Injured Reserve
With the amount he's getting paid and how poorly he's played (not only this season but the past 2 post-seasons), I think you have to at least consider it! Especially given the Dupuis injury.

The thing that scares me about Letang is that you never know what you're getting with him. He is just so consistent. Typically, a player who is making $7M+ a year.. you know what you're getting with them night in and night out. However, with Letang, the consistency just isn't there.

The injuries coupled with the inconsistency worries me, but I'm incredibly torn on the idea of trading Letang. Look at this season, got hurt preseason, came back and sucked, got injured again when he was starting to look good again. That's concerning. He's getting paid consistency money next season and this season has been a mess for him, it could just be more inconsistent play exasperated by being injury prone.
 

cassius

Registered User
Jul 23, 2004
13,560
706
The injuries coupled with the inconsistency worries me, but I'm incredibly torn on the idea of trading Letang. Look at this season, got hurt preseason, came back and sucked, got injured again when he was starting to look good again. That's concerning. He's getting paid consistency money next season and this season has been a mess for him, it could just be more inconsistent play exasperated by being injury prone.
Well said. The Letang deal is certainly fraught with plenty of risks, which is why I am open to trading him if the right offer comes along. He is such a good player that I think he will eventually find his game, but the Penguins are certainly in "win mode" now and can't afford another post-season disaster from Letang.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,544
22,068
Pittsburgh
Well said. The Letang deal is certainly fraught with plenty of risks, which is why I am open to trading him if the right offer comes along. He is such a good player that I think he will eventually find his game, but the Penguins are certainly in "win mode" now and can't afford another post-season disaster from Letang.

Letang is nowhere near the top of the list of reasons we lost in the playoffs the last two years.
 

cassius

Registered User
Jul 23, 2004
13,560
706
Letang is nowhere near the top of the list of reasons we lost in the playoffs the last two years.
Last season? I guess I can buy that somewhat... with the exception of the Boston series. I thought he made a lot of gaffes that definitely altered the course of that series. In those defensive matchups, the margin of error is so slim.

I gotta disagree with you when it comes to the Philly series in 2012. I don't know what series you were watching, but he absolutely stunk.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,544
22,068
Pittsburgh
Last season? I guess I can buy that somewhat... but I gotta disagree with you when it comes to the Philly series in 2012.

The entire team came crumbling down in 2012. There was no structure. There was no goaltending. It was just a hot mess. To try to blame any single skater in that series more than the rest is ridiculous.

As for Boston, I just can't accept anyone blaming the series on bad defense. We scored 2 goals in 4 games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad