2011 Revenue Sharing

Discussion in 'Fugu's Business of Hockey Forum' started by LadyStanley, Feb 23, 2011.

View Users: View Users
  1. LadyStanley

    LadyStanley RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    75,338
    Likes Received:
    3,031
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Sin City
    http://www.bluejacketsxtra.com/live.../23/calvert-will-take-fluky-goal.html?sid=101

     
  2. King Woodballs

    King Woodballs Captain Awesome

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    35,705
    Likes Received:
    1,213
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Your Mind
    ****** deal for them
    I wonder how many teams dont qualify because of the same reason
     
  3. AllByDesign

    AllByDesign Who's this ABD guy??

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    2,317
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Finance.
    Location:
    Location, Location!
    They also stand a chance of making the playoffs. That could help mitigate the offset.
     
  4. LadyStanley

    LadyStanley RIP Fugu

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    75,338
    Likes Received:
    3,031
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Gender:
    Female
    Location:
    Sin City
    And in addition to getting less revenue per game (as a bigger chunk goes to the league -- part of revenue sharing), offset against no player (salary) costs.

    So, they may be paying in (as all playoff teams do) to revenue sharing, and get some (all?) back via RS.

    Interesting fact a bit later in the article. Top 10 pay in (as do playoff teams), and distribution is to lowest 15.
     
  5. kdb209

    kdb209 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    14,870
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    126
    There is a bit of mis-information in that blog post.

    The exclusion is not for "a top-10 television market" - but for a DMA (or equivalent) with >2.5M Households.

    This only excludes: New York (Isles, Rags, & Devils), LA (Kings & Ducks), Chicago (Hawks), Philly (Flyers), Dallas (Stars) and SF Bay Area (Sharks). I don't have Canadian BBM numbers, but Toronto and possibly Montreal are also excluded - not that that would matter.

    The Bay Area crossed the 2.5M HH threshold last year - it's possible that Boston will cross it next year and that Atlanta & DC will within a couple of years.

    I would not be surprised to see the 2.5M HH rule go away in the next CBA - it was implemented as basically a screw Wirtz rule.

    http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/public factsheets/tv/2010-2011 DMA Ranks.pdf

    Mods - you may want to update the DMA post in the Business of Hockey Collection of Information/Data Sources. It still has numbers from '07-'08.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2011
  6. Fugu

    Fugu Guest

    Thanks, kdb, but we have to wait for you to dig these up for us. :)




    Most of the teams that are in the worst financial shape. Ironic, eh?
     
  7. Confucius

    Confucius Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    14,610
    Likes Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    139
    Location:
    Toronto
    So when a team does'nt earn a full share, who gets the part the team misses out on?
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"