1968-2017 - Lowest Scoring Stanley Cup Champions (GvE and TvE Analysis)

quoipourquoi

Goaltender
Jan 26, 2009
10,123
4,126
Hockeytown, MI
The purpose of this thread is to provide two lists based on the post-1967 statistical record:

  • The worst scoring playoff teams to win the Stanley Cup (GvE)
  • The playoff teams most reliant on a goaltending to win the Stanley Cup (TvE)

To create these lists, I will be looking at performance vs. expectation. If you're unfamiliar with EvE, GvE, and TvE; here is a brief overview, using the example of the 1996 Eastern Conference Finals:


Error Rate vs. Expectation (EvE)

John Vanbiesbrouck allows 14 goals on 224 shots (14/224=.063) in a playoff series against a Pittsburgh Penguins team that scores 362 goals on 2645 shots (362/2645=.137) in the regular season. John Vanbiesbrouck allows 45.7% (.063/.137) of what a goaltender would be expected to allow against the Pittsburgh Penguins. John Vanbiesbrouck's EvE is 45.7 in this playoff series.


Goals vs. Expectation (GvE)

The Florida Panthers score 20 goals of support against the Pittsburgh Penguins' two goaltenders in this series over the goaltenders' combined 418 minutes (418/60=6.97 games) for a total of 2.87 goals-per-game. The Pittsburgh Penguins' goaltenders allow 275 goals in their combined 4931 minutes (4931/60=82.18) in the regular season for a total of 3.35 goals-allowed-average. The Florida Panthers score 85.8% (2.87/3.35) of what a team would be expected to score against the Pittsburgh Penguins. The Florida Panthers' GvE is 85.8 in this playoff series.


Threshold vs. Expectation (TvE)

The Florida Panthers score 20 goals of support against the Pittsburgh Penguins' two goaltenders in this series while allowing 224 shots. In order to break even, the Florida Panthers could allow 20 goals on these 224 shots (20/224=.089) against a Pittsburgh Penguins team that scores 362 goals on 2645 shots (362/2645=.137) in the regular season. The Florida Panthers need to allow only 65.2% (.089/.137) of what a team would be expected to allow against the Pittsburgh Penguins in order to reach the threshold. The Florida Panthers' TvE is 65.2 in this playoff series.


I will only be looking at GvE and TvE in this thread. GvE weighted each round by minutes will provide us with the first list: the worst scoring Stanley Cup Champions (performance through four rounds, 1980-2017; performance through three rounds, 1968-1979). TvE weighted each round by shots against will provide us with the second list: the teams most reliant on a goaltending performance to win the Stanley Cup (performance through four rounds, 1980-2017; performance through three rounds, 1968-1979).

Important caveats. While empty net goals are removed from the calculation of playoff goal support, they are not removed from the calculation of regular season shooting percentage. If there comes a point when regular season GF minus ENGs becomes more readily available, I will gladly tweak the calculation to reflect this data. As of now, this would require thumbing through every box score of every regular season game for every team since 1967. Also to the extent that shots allowed is affected by goaltending performance or occurring in the state of New Jersey, I have made no subjective adjustment.

Most important caveat. GvE and TvE look at the series as a whole, rather than a series of individual games in a race for four victories.


Lowest Scoring Stanley Cup Champions
(Goals vs. Expectation, 1968-2017)


RankYearTeamTotal GvER1 GvER2 GvER3 GvER4 GvE
#11986Montreal75.3495.5457.4985.8077.74
#21993Montreal85.6084.13106.5183.5972.24
#31975Philadelphia95.9997.2394.7896.55
#42006Carolina99.3180.44119.93110.6790.29
#51974Philadelphia99.62137.6289.4486.01
#61999Dallas101.2783.61103.53129.9982.13
#72003New Jersey101.3378.4898.32106.67114.31
#81989Calgary102.04118.01127.4765.6997.30
#91997Detroit103.4077.6489.28104.68159.27
#101982New York105.19104.49109.4093.48111.76
#112004Tampa Bay106.9086.23143.62124.6984.32
#122013Chicago106.95118.6396.13110.91105.87
#131994New York107.84178.94130.6879.3585.90
#142007Anaheim107.95101.40102.66103.82126.21
#152009Pittsburgh108.8892.82130.55170.0365.91
#162000New Jersey109.31122.3396.14124.4698.44
#172015Chicago109.62120.67120.92108.0291.35
#181969Montreal110.59139.7178.87134.24
#191979Montreal110.62138.2199.27102.79
#202001Colorado111.64134.6981.03128.16118.09
#211987Edmonton112.88152.22121.0279.65104.03
#221995New Jersey114.0398.0287.66123.20155.89
#231990Edmonton114.2794.50140.89116.31118.70
#241992Pittsburgh116.8593.92123.01131.89132.01
#251991Pittsburgh117.8692.43106.24131.75143.99
#262012Los Angeles118.0597.94184.64108.27100.61
#271984Edmonton121.60132.66115.04126.17120.63
#281996Colorado122.20123.38111.47139.77113.99
#292011Boston122.3288.00169.45105.77147.90
#302016Pittsburgh123.44156.08115.14129.2398.92
#312017Pittsburgh124.79173.53132.8591.57114.89
#322014Los Angeles125.66144.72104.91141.20109.08
#332002Detroit127.70136.59122.47156.9586.65
#342010Chicago127.71103.61137.47117.45148.63
#351978Montreal127.76146.50140.91104.78
#361980New York129.90133.91125.09127.29134.02
#371976Montreal130.07102.39146.73136.98
#381968Montreal130.45132.07147.69107.35
#391977Montreal132.45132.42132.23132.81
#401988Edmonton133.16132.53117.91127.10157.31
#412008Detroit136.06142.57213.31121.02100.19
#421998Detroit136.30150.08134.45127.86131.66
#431981New York137.58147.74115.07142.39155.04
#441983New York139.51130.98133.60178.5797.90
#451971Montreal141.23152.56157.40117.15
#461973Montreal141.24120.06108.53191.02
#471985Edmonton143.2483.40123.39193.42136.06
#481972Boston154.39139.01217.56124.85
#491970Boston197.84175.97215.40212.60
[TBODY] [/TBODY]



Teams Most Reliant on Goaltending to Win the Stanley Cup
(Threshold vs. Expectation, 1968-2017


RankYearTeamTotal TvER1 TvER2 TvER3 TvER4 TvE
#11993Montreal78.5264.3289.8484.6781.74
#21986Montreal87.19101.4568.0094.7293.73
#31974Philadelphia90.24176.7775.8358.99
#42015Chicago90.4495.1393.2993.9275.69
#52011Boston96.4185.35122.9396.0890.96
#61969Montreal97.28151.3061.35109.91
#72017Pittsburgh97.50106.0179.31103.18105.57
#82004Tampa Bay98.7377.06132.59107.4385.45
#92003New Jersey99.7684.54111.7682.64122.93
#102001Colorado100.50173.5983.0188.5493.72
#112007Anaheim101.4382.53100.1092.15146.84
#121999Dallas101.65123.2295.25112.3182.00
#132006Carolina103.0992.06131.57109.9388.27
#141971Montreal104.0177.98173.8276.54
#151996Colorado104.31134.2299.6091.6092.45
#162013Chicago105.99134.8189.85111.6398.08
#171975Philadelphia106.07149.67101.3785.92
#181992Pittsburgh106.2581.8888.03145.57141.68
#192016Pittsburgh106.26123.6980.17120.49106.63
#201997Detroit107.3889.2894.42111.71142.96
#212000New Jersey107.74103.94112.62112.13101.51
#221991Pittsburgh107.8285.2390.79124.82132.61
#232012Los Angeles108.4168.54155.42113.91118.53
#241980New York108.52169.4888.9584.80114.40
#252009Pittsburgh108.5277.83153.81163.3065.70
#261976Montreal108.65109.3994.17131.05
#271983New York111.07113.25133.00116.5773.66
#281990Edmonton111.2794.54117.77122.14115.83
#291994New York112.47217.66145.8670.9788.34
#301984Edmonton112.82120.00105.65130.82103.62
#311973Montreal114.0185.29103.58165.12
#321989Calgary116.49131.12148.45109.6784.30
#332014Los Angeles116.68111.0897.14130.66130.54
#341982New York116.88127.49119.6790.26128.65
#351998Detroit117.71155.77105.6884.18133.41
#361979Montreal118.78133.7393.68144.25
#372010Chicago119.26112.76116.8089.33150.46
#381987Edmonton121.13191.33131.47101.5482.99
#391995New Jersey121.55109.2382.87147.23174.56
#402002Detroit124.63131.72104.85139.11117.17
#411985Edmonton132.8070.96120.54196.27113.73
#422008Detroit134.50112.06209.73121.61113.18
#431978Montreal135.10177.44164.9085.12
#441988Edmonton137.69151.40106.03120.55178.50
#451968Montreal140.76134.73138.47151.82
#461977Montreal141.96172.29123.62132.56
#471972Boston157.01145.37267.6889.67
#481981New York157.92189.44125.73184.46157.08
#491970Boston161.27128.63170.83221.34
[TBODY] [/TBODY]


Reminder: none of the above charts is a reflection of goaltending performance itself - only the demand placed on the goaltenders relative to goal support and shots allowed (TvE).


The 1970 Boston Bruins placed the least amount of pressure on their goaltending in order to win the Stanley Cup, and all three of their series ranked in the top-10 highest scoring (vs. expectation) series from a post-expansion Stanley Cup Champion.
  • 217.56 - 1972 Boston (vs. St. Louis)
  • 215.40 - 1970 Boston (vs. Chicago)
  • 213.31 - 2008 Detroit (vs. Colorado)
  • 212.60 - 1970 Boston (vs. St. Louis)
  • 193.42 - 1985 Edmonton (vs. Chicago)
  • 191.02 - 1973 Montreal (vs. Chicago)
  • 178.57 - 1983 New York (vs. Boston)
  • 184.64 - 2012 Los Angeles (vs. St. Louis)
  • 178.94 - 1994 New York (vs. New York)
  • 175.97 - 1970 Boston (vs. New York)

The 1986 Montreal Canadiens were easily the worst scoring Stanley Cup Champion of the post-expansion era, but due to their shot prevention and opposition strength, the 1993 Montreal Canadiens still had the more difficult threshold. Two of the 1986 Montreal Canadiens' series ranked in the top-10 least productive (vs. expectation) series from a post-expansion Stanley Cup Champion.

  • 57.49 - 1986 Montreal (vs. Hartford)
  • 65.69 - 1989 Calgary (vs. Chicago)
  • 65.91 - 2009 Pittsburgh (vs. Detroit)
  • 72.24 - 1993 Montreal (vs. Los Angeles)
  • 77.64 - 1997 Detroit (vs. St. Louis)
  • 77.74 - 1986 Montreal (vs. Calgary)
  • 78.48 - 2003 New Jersey (vs. Boston)
  • 78.87 - 1969 Montreal (vs. Boston)
  • 79.35 - 1994 New York (vs. New Jersey)
  • 79.65 - 1987 Edmonton (vs. Detroit)

The 1993 Montreal Canadiens and the 2015 Chicago Blackhawks are the only two Stanley Cup Champions in the post-expansion era to have had a Threshold vs. Expectation (TvE) that necessitated an above-average goaltending performance in all four series.

The 1994 New York Rangers are the only team to have individual series that rank in both the top-10 highest AND lowest scoring (vs. expectation).


I'll be posting a second thread looking at the threshold necessary for reaching the Stanley Cup Finals in the four-round era some time in the next few days - GvE and TvE, but strictly looking at 1980-2017 (plus the 1979 New York Rangers).
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad