Nevada Jones
I like hockey.
Well, another chance to steal home ice Monday. Hopefully a better showing by our boys.
GO!!! GO!!!
GO!!! GO!!!
Well we only lost by 2..... take not of what went wrong tonight and come out and play Vegas hockey in Game 2.
I would like to know what the **** goalie interference is. No consistency with the war room's calls.
And take away the first seven minutes or so, we outscore the Jets 2-1.Well we only lost by 2..... take not of what went wrong tonight and come out and play Vegas hockey in Game 2.
Official press release: "Our team of experts in the Toronto Situation Room will make an objective and unbiased decision, using the finest technology available to render a quick and definitive ruling."
Reality behind the rhetoric:
View attachment 120825
"Heads, Winnipeg. Tails, Jets. Go Canada!"
"After a lengthy video review, the officials ruled that Armia made contact with Fleury, but only after he had already redirected the puck into the net. Therefore, the goal was awarded as Armia did not inhibit Fleury's ability to make the save. "
"At 7:35 of the first period in the Golden Knights/Jets game, video review determined that the puck deflected off of Joel Armia's skate and entered the Vegas net in a legal fashion. According to Rule 49.2 "A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player's skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal." However, the Referee informed the Situation Room that he had "no goal" due to goaltender interference on the play. Winnipeg then requested a Coach's Challenge to review the "Interference on the Goalkeeper" decision that resulted in a "no goal" call. After reviewing all available replays and consulting with the Referee, the Situation Room determined that the contact between Winnipeg's Joel Armia and Vegas goaltender Marc-Andre Fleury occurred after the puck was deflected into the net and, therefore, no goaltender interference infractions occurred."
If an attacking player establishes a significant position within the goal crease, so as to obstruct the goalkeeper's vision and impair his ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
If, after any contact by a goalkeeper who is attempting to establish position in his goal crease, the attacking player does not immediately vacate his current position in the goal crease (i.e. give ground to the goalkeeper), and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. In all such cases, whether or not a goal is scored, the attacking player will receive a minor penalty for goalkeeper interference.
Not the ref/war room's fault. This loss was squarely on the Knights. They know this. How they rebound Monday will tell the story. I'm confident they will be fine.