It was just my angry vote, 'cus Mikkola didn't win last poll.
I'm still legimate puzzled how those prospects are ahead of Mikkola. We're still speaking of next new nowadays kind of defenseman what is coming from Finland. Big D who's fast, great own end, strong 1on1, have great defensive stick and have really mean streak mentatility. Only what need to work is his puck handling and transition game, but I think that will come throught when he's getting big ice minutes in Tappara for example.
But well people are going to suprise when he comes in NA.
#10-Zach Sanford (83%)
#11-Osskar Sundqvist (46%)
#12-Samuel Blais (27%
Well, Sanford and Sundqvist have already played in the NHL and probably could play there in a limited capacity this year. With regards to Sanford, he has some tools that give people the hope that he has high potential - just like Mikkola. With regards to Blais, he just put up a fantastic year in the AHL.
I like Mikkola; I've been voting for him. Those limitations are major limitations though, and while you can predict that he'll overcome them, you can't just assume that he will. Frankly, limitations like that are what separate a good Dman from a meh Dman. If he can't handle the puck and isn't good in transition, he's a liability both defensively, insofar as dealing with a forecheck, etc. and offensively. That's a big deal. Plus, he's yet to show that he can adjust to the NA ice size, which, while you would think he will be able to fine given his pluses (i.e. skating), isn't a sure thing.
At this point in the voting, preferences and priorities shift a lot. Some people vote more on potential, some more on "floor," some on a combination thereof, and some based purely on readiness. I don't think parsing votes here is a productive conversation to have.
Honestly, from the conversations I've seen surrounding Mikkola, people are pretty high on him. He'll be 4th defenseman on this list behind someone who just had a spectacular rookie AHL season, someone breaking into the NHL, and another great skating prospect that is good on the puck.
I just think that the question marks surrounding his puck play are enough to justify him being in this area of the list.