I love lunch pail players. Like Gordon, Vitale, etc. You don't have to convince me of their worth. Some of my favorite players when the Coyotes came to town, and I started following them in addition to the Hawks, were Bob Corkum, Juha Ylonen, Whitey Stapleton, etc. Those were guys good in their zone, who sacrificed their bodies all the time, and contributed on the PK. Corkum was a top PK guy, hit hard, was great on the dot, and had a nice wrister. Ylonen was fast, gritty, and defensively sound with hands of stone. Stapleton was great positionally and shifty. They were grind it out guys.
Our current crew are nowhere near as good (save Vitale and maybe McMillan). Even if they were as good, I imagine if Schoeney had played Bob Corkum on the second line, while Isbister was a scratch I would have had a fit about that too. If Stapleton or someone similar was getting regular ice time in the top nine, while Handzus and Nagy and Kilger were young scratches I would not have been happy about that either.
I include Kilger, because noone knew what we had in him at the time, but hopes were high he'd be a great 2nd line guy like Hanzal/Handzus. And we could be just as wrong about, say Lessio or any of the other names as we were about Kilger. There are a million things that can screw up a development curve (Mueller, etc). Our guys could all be busts, but how do you know until they get an actual opportunity? They've proven what they've needed to at other levels. Now they have to get ice time to develop at the next level. Without being so afraid of making a mistake that they forget to play their game.
I don't care that Tippett doesn't believe that. There are 30 some odd franchises in the league, and I've never heard another coach say there is zero room for development at the NHL level. Even the other veteran-favoring coaches at least say the right things. That'd be great in New York or Toronto. That a team in our situation is publicly saying that is nothing short of tragically short-sighted.