Missed this one. Anyone care to give me the rundown?
My take on trading Connolly. Since some of you want to waive him what value do you think he has that'll bring back a top 4 upgrade?
Say we do trade him for a veteran defender, now we start scratching Sustr. We also then have to call up Blunden if a forward is injured. We lose a decent forward and we stagnate Sustr. Sustr then becomes nothing more then a depth defender because he loses valuable development ice time.
So this vet defender helps but we don't win the cup and walks. Sustr becomes Barberio as a #7 only and we lose a potential 2/3 line 20 goal scorer. Just makes no sense to me right now. We should be scratching Morrow/Brown/Barberio and let Connolly/Namestnikov/Paquette all play.
Ok butterfly effect settle down.
I could also win the lottery.
My take on trading Connolly. Since some of you want to waive him what value do you think he has that'll bring back a top 4 upgrade?
Say we do trade him for a veteran defender, now we start scratching Sustr. We also then have to call up Blunden if a forward is injured. We lose a decent forward and we stagnate Sustr. Sustr then becomes nothing more then a depth defender because he loses valuable development ice time.
So this vet defender helps but we don't win the cup and walks. Sustr becomes Barberio as a #7 only and we lose a potential 2/3 line 20 goal scorer. Just makes no sense to me right now. We should be scratching Morrow/Brown/Barberio and let Connolly/Namestnikov/Paquette all play.
We certainly have bought ourselves some breathing room with regards to making trades (ie. wait for TDL!). One thing that concerns me is the way our defensemen responded to being pressured in the D-zone before starting the rush. The Sens would send two guys in and one of our 2nd or 3rd pairing guys would always cough the puck up.
I mean, there's an easy solution to this problem.
Play Hedman/Stralman 60 minutes.
But I noticed that too. I was thinking that maybe splitting up Hedman/Stralman would be good just to give us two pairings that aren't complete ass, and save the two of them together when we play teams like the Ducks where there's just one line we REALLY need to shut down. I don't know if that's the right move, though - I think we'll see by game 40 or so that pairing being out there 25+ minutes, though. We haven't really had a shutdown pairing in a long time that we could lean on like that.
I think it's something that could be coached for the time being. I suspect Hedman and Stralman's skill/talent/hIQ is high enough that they can come up with better solutions on the fly, but guys like Gudas, Garrison(maybe, he's been pretty solid lately), and Carle seem like they could manage if they were presented with the scenario in practice and given a method for dealing with it.
Ottawa desperate for offense with Ryan out long term, could see Yzerman selling high on Connolly right now.
Ottawa desperate for offense with Ryan out long term, could see Yzerman selling high on Connolly right now.
I feel like Connolly's value is so low that it's impossible to sell high on him. Maybe if he can start sponging up some PP points or something. But right now, every fanbase will look at his stats and hold their GM's feet to the fire if he gives up anything significant.