I mean it worked out in this instance lol.As we've said in the past, if it happens, hit the report button. We have no other way of knowing. Also tagging posters to bait them doesn't help.
But I'll make sure to do that in the future.
I mean it worked out in this instance lol.As we've said in the past, if it happens, hit the report button. We have no other way of knowing. Also tagging posters to bait them doesn't help.
Can't argue with that.If you are going to face bad puck luck, horrendously one-sided referees, and a great effort from the other goaltender may as well get them all out of the way in one game.
Did we watch the same game? There were stretches in that game where colorado had nothing going.Yeah, the officiating wasn't great, but Tampa was outplayed in almost every facet of that game. When facing a team just as talented(if not moreso) than your own, the level of play from the Bolts is rarely going to lead to the W. The early power play ineptitude and more defensive lapses hurt badly.
Disagree. There was a solid half of the game where Colorado was being outplayed. The whole first period pretty much, and most of the third.Yeah, the officiating wasn't great, but Tampa was outplayed in almost every facet of that game. When facing a team just as talented(if not moreso) than your own, the level of play from the Bolts is rarely going to lead to the W. The early power play ineptitude and more defensive lapses hurt badly.
Tampa may have had more shots, but far fewer dangerous attempts for Georgiev to stop. He was the better G, their power play and pk were better, and they converted on Tampa's miscues. I didn't see Tampa outplaying them over the stretch of any one period, and certainly not for half the game. I missed some of the 1st and 2nd, but I've seen enough on replay.Disagree. There was a solid half of the game where Colorado was being outplayed. The whole first period pretty much, and most of the third.
And Tampa had far more of them.The Avs had the better power play, pk, better G and defense. Tampa had early opportunities to take control, but they failed. Then Colorado put it away early in the 2nd. Perhaps if Tampa had either made it 3-2 by the end of the 2nd, or came out and done anything tbe 1st 10 minutes of the 3rd, the result may have been different, but it is what it is.Did we watch the same game? There were stretches in that game where colorado had nothing going.
Games like this happen. But to suggest Tampa was outplayed for almost the entire game is laughable.And Tampa had far more of them.The Avs had the better power play, pk, better G and defense. Tampa had early opportunities to take control, but they failed. Then Colorado put it away early in the 2nd. Perhaps if Tampa had either made it 3-2 by the end of the 2nd, or came out and done anything tbe 1st 10 minutes of the 3rd, the result may have been different, but it is what it is.
They might have been the better team for part of the 1st, the last few minutes of the 2nd, and a few minutes in the latter stages of the 3rd. As I said, Tampa was outplayed in just about every facet of the game, regardless of how much time they may or may not have looked solid. When you fail to capitalize on your opportunities and the other team exploits some of your mistakes, and the other team's goalie is better, you've likely been outplayed, which was my point.Games like this happen. But to suggest Tampa was outplayed for almost the entire game is laughable.
Teams get stonewalled by goalies all the time. That doesn't mean they got outplayed. Thats just hockey.They might have been the better team for part of the 1st, the last few minutes of the 2nd, and a few minutes in the latter stages of the 3rd. As I said, Tampa was outplayed in just about every facet of the game, regardless of how much time they may or may not have looked solid. When you fail to capitalize on your opportunities and the other team exploits some of your mistakes, and the other team's goalie is better, you've likely been outplayed, which was my point.
Except they were worse on the power play, worse on the pk, continued to make defensive gaffes and failed on most of their high danger chances(which weren't alot). Yes, they were stonewalled by a good goalie, and they were outplayed in several other areas.Teams get stonewalled by goalies all the time. That doesn't mean they got outplayed. Thats just hockey.
I disagreeExcept they were worse on the power play, worse on the pk, continued to make defensive gaffes and failed on most of their high danger chances(which weren't alot). Yes, they were stonewalled by a good goalie, and they were outplayed in several other areas.
That's fine, but it doesn't change the facts and the stats from last night say otherwise(which is in part what I've based my argument on). I won't look at the team when they play at 75-80% of what they're capable of doing and say, well, guess they played well and should've earned a point. Nah, when you bring that effort against the better teams you are going to often lose. If that was the best the team could do, then I'd be somewhat fine with last night, but it was far from it.I disagree