Post-Game Talk: 11/22/17 | Canucks 5 @ Penguins 2 | We have a fun team to watch

Chairman Maouth

Retired Staff
Apr 29, 2009
26,118
12,812
Comox Valley

Canucks Game Day: Back at it in Pittsburgh


Points to ponder as the Canucks prepare for their second game in two nights in the Keystone State (4 p.m. PT, PPG Paints Arena, Sportsnet Pacific, Sportsnet 650 AM). The Canucks beat the Penguins 4-2 at The Rog three weeks ago, is a repeat performance in store?

Canucks Game Day: Back at it in Pittsburgh

Play Smack the Penguin



Tjt68nO.jpg
G09czOo.jpg




REMINDER
IF YOU ARE ON TEAM TANK KEEP IT IN THE DESIGNATED TANK THREAD
 
Last edited:

DL44

Status quo
Sep 26, 2006
17,909
3,831
Location: Location:
Just compete.

Last night wasnt the most taxing game, so hopefully theyll have a lot in the tank to keep it close.

We may be able to steal 2 with goaltending and special teams....

We finally have a good looking 1st unit power play! Pot one or two in an otherwise tightly played game, and it'll be a great start to the 6 gamer.

They probably watched a tonne of video of Boeser's hattrick... then wached him pot another couple last night... so you know they'll be keying in on him.
Should open it up a little bit for Sedin and Granlund lines.

No Malkin tonight.
The Pens haven't beat anyone good in a long time.
 

JuniorNelson

Registered User
Jan 21, 2010
8,631
320
E.Vancouver
Tons of talk about Boeser! Great for Canucks. It's like they are recovering from along illness or a drought or something. Positives were really hard to point out for this team for the last few seasons. Carrying some media buzz into the Champion's rink must feel good for these guys?

One of the great surprises (to me) this season was the play of Dorsett. Canucks lose a lot with him out.

Pens will beat Canucks if they feel like it.
 

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
45,839
31,173
It's hard to bet on on a Tanev-less Canucks. It's hard to bet against the reigning SC winners.

But I'm going to.


2-1 Canucks

Virtanen and Eriksson

Love the optimism but feel like this is pretty much a guaranteed loss. 5-2 Pens both our goals by Boeser
 

Eddy Punch Clock

Jack Adams 2028
Jun 13, 2007
13,126
1,823
Chillbillyville
8 - 7 Penguins.

Boeser scores all 7 of our goals in the first period, gets traded to Pittsburgh for Sydney Crosby in the first intermission, and then scores all 8 of the Penguins goals..... Sydney Crosby gets a concussion on his first shift as a Canuck... retires from hockey the next day.
 

DL44

Status quo
Sep 26, 2006
17,909
3,831
Location: Location:
This is the game they decide to audition Guentzel as a center option (out need tho cuz no Malkin). No better way to break him in than pair him with their highest scoring winger.

Pens lines look like a mish mash of players without Malkin in there and Guentzel off of Crosby's wing...

Sheary - Crosby - Hornqvist
Rust - Guentzel - Kessel
Hagelin - Sheahan - Archibald(2nd gm this season)
Kuhnhackl - McKegg - Reaves

Dumoulin - Letang (gong show this season and vs us last game)
Maatta - Schultz
Humwick - Cole

Murray


A little perspective on the Penguins depth scoring issue...

Burmistrov has more pts than EVERY player in their bottom 6.
 

Ryp37

Registered User
Nov 6, 2011
7,525
1,081
Don't know what to expect with this team so we got that going for us which is nice

This is the game they decide to audition Guentzel as a center option (out need tho cuz no Malkin). No better way to break him in than pair him with their highest scoring winger.

Pens lines look like a mish mash of players without Malkin in there and Guentzel off of Crosby's wing...

Sheary - Crosby - Hornqvist
Rust - Guentzel - Kessel
Hagelin - Sheahan - Archibald(2nd gm this season)
Kuhnhackl - McKegg - Reaves

Dumoulin - Letang (gong show this season and vs us last game)
Maatta - Schultz
Humwick - Cole

Murray


A little perspective on the Penguins depth scoring issue...

Burmistrov has more pts than EVERY player in their bottom 6.

Shoulda re-signed old man Cullen
 

DL44

Status quo
Sep 26, 2006
17,909
3,831
Location: Location:
Start is important...

We don't seem to start well. (statistically the pens are actually worse)
Pens are on 3 days rest.
We typically look tired into the 3rd on the second half games.
We need a strong middle period...

For whatever reason, we've been good in the middle periods under Green and we can be iffy and holding on in thirds.
Fully expect the 3rd to be rough... hoping the work thru 40 carries us through.

Shoulda re-signed old man Cullen

And shoulda made a run at Bonino.. but that was a tough contract to match for em.
 

Pastor Of Muppetz

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
26,215
16,114
Certainly not banking on a win,but you never know with this team...Maybe the Pens will take us lightly,but you would have to assume that we have their full attention after beating them a couple of weeks back.
 

drivier

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
577
167
Vancouver
what is the legality of the skill testing question? Anyone know?


1. Is a skill-testing question required?
Skill-testing questions are a sort of Canadian thing. The short answer is that skill-testing questions are usually, but not always, required to operate a contest in Canada. They are commonly required and administered to potential winners before being declared a winner as one way to avoid the illegal lottery offences of the Canadian federal Criminal Code. In general, the Code prohibits games of chance (or mixed chance and skill) where contestants pay money or other consideration (i.e., something of value) to win a prize. Including a skill-testing question is one way to remove a contest from many of the lottery offences that include pure chance as an element of the offence (i.e., a way to remove some chance via the skill of a reasonably difficult question, typically a two-digit, four-step math question). As such, including a skill-testing question makes a promotion one of “mixed chance and skill”, so that if consideration is then also removed running a contest becomes low risk and a common strategy used by contest promoters to avoid the Code’s illegal lottery offences. To come back to the point that they are not always required, promoters sometimes operate “pure skill” contests (which are generally not addressed by the relevant lottery sections of the Code) or award prizes that are not listed in the relevant Codesections as one way to require a purchase as a condition of participation. The existing Canadian case law under the Code’s lottery sections (section 206) is, however, generally old and often inconsistent so determining whether a contest is one of “pure skill” and whether a purchase or other consideration can be required can be complex and uncertain. As such, cautious contest promoters generally remove two of the three elements of an illegal lottery to be safe (i.e., remove consideration through a “no purchase” entry option and include a “skill-testing question” to remove part of the chance element).

Source: http://www.ipvancouverblog.com/2013/11/top-10-questions-about-canadian-contest-sweepstakes-laws-part-i/

Criminal code lottery offence is below for reference:

206. (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years who (…)
  • (f) disposes of any goods, wares or merchandise by any game of chance or any game of mixed chance and skill in which the contestant or competitor pays money or other valuable consideration; (…)
Of note, even one person that got the question wrong (twice) still got the prize: Winner denied Tim Hortons prize
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoShowWilly

drivier

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
577
167
Vancouver
In game related news, Nilsson listed as likely but not confirmed at Daily Faceoff (edit: but tweet from Dan above confirms he starts).

I didn't think he performed well in his last game and am anticipating a bounce-back. I don't know if he'll get the support he needs though.

(3-2 loss in a shoot-out followed by condemnation on Benning for not having enough shootout specialists)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad