Where do you see these players the upcoming season, NHL-games, points.
And who will have the best career out of them?
And who will have the best career out of them?
Jarnkrok has the easiest path and it shocks me so many are ready to give up. He still has a ton if potential
Hook just does not have the potential that Faila, Ã…berg, Arvidsson. All thee without a doubt will get a look this year. I expect Arvdsson to make the team first followed by Faila before the end of this season and Ã…berg to be bought in at the end of the year. Ã…berg will have to earn a roster spot in camp in 2016 if not he will make the team later in the year.
Aberg isn't gonna' see Nash this year unless we have a rash of injuries, or we really suck.
Hook is a lock, and he's not going down unless we absolutely give up on him; it's not his "game" that's the problem, it's his size, and maybe a bit of lack of offensive aggressiveness.
Arvy. I think for this year, it probably depends on how the other guys look in camp - Watson, Fiala, and Moses (who is not on the roster according to the website) - rather than he himself. I don't think we're going to sit a "skill" guy who can still learn at Milw, so I believe we want Watson to make the roster, regardless of his 2way deal for this year, which makes BorkBork #13. Leaves one spot on the 3rd - I think Fiala gets it if he shows he can play reasonable D; I think Moses is next in line, with Arvy last. Outside chance that, if Watson falls flat on his face, we keep Arvy, but only if he's gonna' start instead of Borky on the 4th. I think Arvy ends up starting in Milw and ends up first or 2nd call-up.
Arvy has got the most potential offensive upside, but I'm not quite ready to say Hook isn't gonna' turn out to be a nice 2way 2/3C, with 17/35 upside and a solid 40+ guy.
How has Arvidsson and Jarnkrok looked?
Arvidsson has looked like a rookie has got mauled a bit which is a concern. Scored his first on a fluke play.
So that explains why he was benched.