Creativero
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2015
- 895
- 30
Zubov wasn't really thought of as a top defenseman at that point. He improved alot In his late 20s and 30s. Robitaille was 1 year removed from 8 consecutive 40+ goal seasons.
Last edited:
It's interesting that Pittsburgh had the following:
1993-94 - 4th in scoring, 18.8% power play
1994-95 - 2nd in scoring, 19.0% PP
1995-96 - 1st in scoring, 26.0% PP (with Zubov)
1996-97 - 1st in scoring, 21.8% PP
From 1995-96 to 1996-97:
Lemieux - 31+48 on the power play to 15+22
Jagr - 20+31 on the PP to 11+14
Francis - 12+42 on the PP to 10+24
The Rangers made a lot of questionable trades back then
Doug Weight to Edmonton for Tikkannen
Tony Amonte for Brian Noonan and Stephane Matteau
Even the Gartner for Anderson trade was kinda odd since Gartner was the superior goal scorer at the time
It's almost as if they were determined to deal away all the players who would've been included in the Lindros trade
It would be interesting to see what their lineup would've looked like had they kept their young assets
It's interesting that Pittsburgh had the following:
1993-94 - 4th in scoring, 18.8% power play
1994-95 - 2nd in scoring, 19.0% PP
1995-96 - 1st in scoring, 26.0% PP (with Zubov)
1996-97 - 1st in scoring, 21.8% PP
From 1995-96 to 1996-97:
Lemieux - 31+48 on the power play to 15+22
Jagr - 20+31 on the PP to 11+14
Francis - 12+42 on the PP to 10+24
The Rangers traded the young established players for older established players. It sounded like locker room trades really.