Confirmed with Link: Zaitsev waived

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
15,719
9,934
Ok thanks for looking those up and correcting me, not my intent to misinform but I didn’t look up any stats etc. I remember reading after his first or second game back that he had ~20 mins of ice time (lots of pk mind you) and was second in toi for dmen that game, but maybe that was incorrect.

Admittedly, for me and I assume others, when I see him on ice I watch closely and am perhaps overly critical or at least looking for any error or flub at this point. Confirmation bias is real. That said, they occur often and there’s history. This is not an imagined narrative even if many fans are over sensitive towards it at this point.

In any case, I believe the team is better without him on the ice. Waiving him is good for the team and probably for dj too.
The game he had 20 minutes he spent over 11 minutes on the PK
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
30,848
9,786
Montreal, Canada
Just cut him lose with a buyout. My option

No brainer, $1,666,667 buyout cost spread over 2 years! Very cheap for a money conscious franchise


If the Sabres and Wings make the playoffs, or are at least bubble teams, we'll officially be the next Sabres.

We won something after all lol

Yup.

TeamLast appearance in post-seasonPost-season drought
2010–1111 seasons
2015–166 seasons
2016–175 seasons
2017–184 seasons
2017–184 seasons
2018–193 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2020–211 season
2020–211 season
never (inception of franchise in 2021–22)1 season
2020–211 season
2020–211 season
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
4,454
2,797
Brampton
I used to wonder how teams like the Sabres, Oil, Hawks (before Kane & Toews) were mediocre for so long. I definitely have some more perspective now. I almost find it somewhat impressive how poorly managed we are.

On the bright side, it does make me enjoy watching in general a bit more because sometimes I'll pay more attention to other teams to see how the math works in terms of our playoffs odds.
 

JackieDaytona

regular human hockey fan.
Oct 21, 2007
1,481
1,328
I didn’t know you could waive someone without the intent of sending them down? What is the purpose, like aside from this situation with zaitsev, what is the logistic or procedural purpose to waive a player other than to buy them out or send them to the ahl? Just to give other teams a crack at picking him up?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,803
11,131
No brainer, $1,666,667 buyout cost spread over 2 years! Very cheap for a money conscious franchise




Yup.

TeamLast appearance in post-seasonPost-season drought
2010–1111 seasons
2015–166 seasons
2016–175 seasons
2017–184 seasons
2017–184 seasons
2018–193 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2019–202 seasons
2020–211 season
2020–211 season
never (inception of franchise in 2021–22)1 season
2020–211 season
2020–211 season
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,803
11,131
It’s not only the 1.67 million x 2 years, it’s also the $2 million signing bonus you didn’t mention, and we already have enough dead cap money for the next 2 years.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
30,848
9,786
Montreal, Canada
I used to wonder how teams like the Sabres, Oil, Hawks (before Kane & Toews) were mediocre for so long. I definitely have some more perspective now. I almost find it somewhat impressive how poorly managed we are.

On the bright side, it does make me enjoy watching in general a bit more because sometimes I'll pay more attention to other teams to see how the math works in terms of our playoffs odds.

Dorion is very good into "numbing" the masses, most people will notice a DeBrincat trade and a Giroux signing but will not see the myriads of smaller blunders that hurt us by accumulation

It’s not only the 1.67 million x 2 years, it’s also the $2 million signing bonus you didn’t mention, and we already have enough dead cap money for the next 2 years.

Just more sunk cost from the Dorion era. Fix his mess to have a fresh start

I didn’t know you could waive someone without the intent of sending them down? What is the purpose, like aside from this situation with zaitsev, what is the logistic or procedural purpose to waive a player other than to buy them out or send them to the ahl? Just to give other teams a crack at picking him up?

That he'd get claimed, which is delusional at best
 
  • Like
Reactions: JackieDaytona

JD1

Registered User
Sep 12, 2005
16,129
9,700
Zaitsev is actually why we lost last night. Because he sucks, Holden had to play. But Holden sucks. He can only handle 12 minutes. That means Chabot played 32, was dog tired and sucked because he was tired. It's all Zaitsev's fault
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad