GDT: Your New Jersey Devils (18-29-5) vs. Vancouver Canucks (26-22-6), 7:30 PM, MSG+

Status
Not open for further replies.

glenwo2

LINDY RUFF NEEDS VIAGRA!!
Oct 18, 2008
52,067
24,354
New Jersey(No Fanz!)
Grit...syuk?

surprised-icegif-2.gif
 

RangerDoggo

The Devils have a culture of failure
Feb 3, 2016
3,166
2,592
Brooklyn via NJ, like the Nets
I think that was the biggest Devils win I’ve seen live. Yeah, Halak and the Nucks defense was terrible, but the offense just clicked. This is the sort of play I was hoping we’d see more of and more consistently this season.

Other notes:
  • I got in for free thanks to a ticket rep. He was very hard up to dump a three-game package on me, to the point where he was offering multiple free games if I bought one. Mighty tempting, I gotta say, but I have a wedding to save up for.
  • Vaccine checks are still spotty. When I came in against Seattle, I got checked but not my brother in law. This time, I didn’t get checked but I heard someone at the door shout to get proof ready,
  • I had a sign that said “I want to see one more live Devils win before we all die,” with the word “die” written wavy in between a Devils logo and a mushroom cloud. It got quite a few laughs, but unfortunately I was eventually told it was inappropriate and tore the sign up. I kinda felt that was going to happen but it was worth it.
  • Siegenthaler, a Swiss, has the same skin tone as my wife, who’s Mexican. What gives?
  • Our defense looked pretty good. I want to see less frantic, “pass for the sake of passing” bullcrap from them and more games like this.
  • Gotta start Daws more than Gillies at this point, IMO. I’d like to see a respectable finish to the season and Gillies just doesn’t cut the mustard for that role.
 

Its Always Sundstrom

Among the optimists.
Sponsor
Dec 1, 2019
4,659
9,649
Land of Hope & Cups.
I think that was the biggest Devils win I’ve seen live. Yeah, Halak and the Nucks defense was terrible, but the offense just clicked. This is the sort of play I was hoping we’d see more of and more consistently this season.

Other notes:
  • I got in for free thanks to a ticket rep. He was very hard up to dump a three-game package on me, to the point where he was offering multiple free games if I bought one. Mighty tempting, I gotta say, but I have a wedding to save up for.
  • Vaccine checks are still spotty. When I came in against Seattle, I got checked but not my brother in law. This time, I didn’t get checked but I heard someone at the door shout to get proof ready,
  • I had a sign that said “I want to see one more live Devils win before we all die,” with the word “die” written wavy in between a Devils logo and a mushroom cloud. It got quite a few laughs, but unfortunately I was eventually told it was inappropriate and tore the sign up. I kinda felt that was going to happen but it was worth it.
  • Siegenthaler, a Swiss, has the same skin tone as my wife, who’s Mexican. What gives?
  • Our defense looked pretty good. I want to see less frantic, “pass for the sake of passing” bullcrap from them and more games like this.
  • Gotta start Daws more than Gillies at this point, IMO. I’d like to see a respectable finish to the season and Gillies just doesn’t cut the mustard for that role.

Good on ya.

I believe Siegs is half Thai.
 

mtnet

LGD!
Oct 31, 2014
5,665
4,200
Sounds like we got some goaltending last night. Outshot slightly but ended up winning by a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleedred

Camille the Eel

Registered User
I am wondering about the interference rule. On Hamiltons goal, Tatar turns and blocks a Canucks player from pursuing the puck up the boards, freeing up Boqvist from pursuit to create the 2 on 1.

Tatar doesn’t move into the Canuck forwards path. He’s already there. But he does turn and intentionally impede him with a cross check.

Is that arguably interfering? Or is it okay because he’s holding a position he already has?
 

GameSeven

ἢ τὰς ἢ ἐπὶ τὰς
Jan 11, 2008
4,609
2,521
I am wondering about the interference rule. On Hamiltons goal, Tatar turns and blocks a Canucks player from pursuing the puck up the boards, freeing up Boqvist from pursuit to create the 2 on 1.

Tatar doesn’t move into the Canuck forwards path. He’s already there. But he does turn and intentionally impede him with a cross check.

Is that arguably interfering? Or is it okay because he’s holding a position he already has?
My first thought on seeing that replay was that it deserved an interference call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Camille the Eel

Hockey Sports Fan

Registered Loser
Sponsor
Jun 30, 2010
10,651
4,106
Connecticut
I think that was the biggest Devils win I’ve seen live. Yeah, Halak and the Nucks defense was terrible, but the offense just clicked. This is the sort of play I was hoping we’d see more of and more consistently this season.

Other notes:
  • I got in for free thanks to a ticket rep. He was very hard up to dump a three-game package on me, to the point where he was offering multiple free games if I bought one. Mighty tempting, I gotta say, but I have a wedding to save up for.
  • Vaccine checks are still spotty. When I came in against Seattle, I got checked but not my brother in law. This time, I didn’t get checked but I heard someone at the door shout to get proof ready,
  • I had a sign that said “I want to see one more live Devils win before we all die,” with the word “die” written wavy in between a Devils logo and a mushroom cloud. It got quite a few laughs, but unfortunately I was eventually told it was inappropriate and tore the sign up. I kinda felt that was going to happen but it was worth it.
  • Siegenthaler, a Swiss, has the same skin tone as my wife, who’s Mexican. What gives?
  • Our defense looked pretty good. I want to see less frantic, “pass for the sake of passing” bullcrap from them and more games like this.
  • Gotta start Daws more than Gillies at this point, IMO. I’d like to see a respectable finish to the season and Gillies just doesn’t cut the mustard for that role.
Got a pic of that sign? I get why you had to get rid of it but that’s great. :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bleedred

Camille the Eel

Registered User
My first thought on seeing that replay was that it deserved an interference call.
Looked like it to me because he turns and checks him intentionally - then I began wondering about the rule. He’s not playing the puck. No pretense of that. He actually turns and uses his stick to stop the forward. But he is entitled to occupy his ground. I just don’t maybe understand the rule? Or was it a big time missed call.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad