Snazu
I contribute nothing
- Feb 2, 2007
- 632
- 128
Yes I'd still trade for Hamilton... Read it as "would you trade Dougie Hamilton"..
Guilty of this as well lol.
So you 2 must be the 2 "no"s then?
Yes I'd still trade for Hamilton... Read it as "would you trade Dougie Hamilton"..
Guilty of this as well lol.
I looked at who the 2 were and when I saw your name I just assumed you were being a jerk lolGuilty of this as well lol.
I looked at who the 2 were and when I saw your name I just assumed you were being a jerk lol
Yes he s so special that he needs more time than 99% of all the other players who moved to a new club in the summer .Hamilton is not that bad
He has to adjust to the new team
what is the point in posts like this? the difference in systems between the Flames & Bruins is night and day; when Suter joined the Wild it took him 10+ games despite them both being defensive teams.Yes he s so special that he needs more time than 99% of all the other players who moved to a new club in the summer .
what is the point in posts like this? the difference in systems between the Flames & Bruins is night and day; when Suter joined the Wild it took him 10+ games despite them both being defensive teams.
Hamilton is just like Wideman - the more minutes they play the more effective they are.
Problem now is Wideman and Russell are taking too many minutes away from Hamilton.
I believe, long term, once the flames go with 25 minutes a game for Gio, Brodie and Hamilton they will be better off. Hamilton needs a regehr-willie mitchell type partner.
I would still take Dougie over Myers. He will be much more productive over his career, Myers is no more than a 30 point dman. Also, Dougie will be more physical.