Always liked Gryba - he knew his game. But if you're talking Gryba aren't you talking bottom pairing RD. Boro and Gryba would be a pretty bad puck moving tandem. As would Gryba and PW or Cowen.
I like the idea of Wideman as the bottom RD... he just hasn't really played that well. But in theory if we're keeping Boro or PW we need a guy with Wideman's puck skills more than Gryba's physicality.
I think if we had Gryba we'd be searching for a guy to play LD and move the puck for the bottom pairing - so we'd still be looking for a legit bottom pairing guy... so we'd be in the same position we're in now but with different names on the jerseys.
I agree with most of this. What got me thinking was looking ahead to next season and the very real possibility of Chabot making the team (as much as I would hate to see him rushed). Gryba would likely make a better partner for Chabot than Boro, Wiercioch or Wideman.
Could he have been the lesser of three evils (Cowen and Wiercioch)?
Gryba, Boro, Wiercioch, Wideman, Cowen... can my answer be "none of the above"?
I will pass on all five, and take two from the top of the deck, please.
Gryba is a RHD, Cowen and Wier are both LHD. The question is: Gryba or Wideman? IMO Wideman is better.
have i been too soft on wideman thinking for him he's been ehh with room to grow?
have i been too soft on wideman thinking for him he's been ehh with room to grow?
Gryba is a RHD, Cowen and Wier are both LHD. The question is: Gryba or Wideman? IMO Wideman is better.
I'm aware of that, but I think the question of RHD vs. LHD went out the window when Cameron played Borowiecki at LW (not to mention Borowiecki and Wiercioch at RD at times).
I'm just going to piggyback off of this to ask which duo would be better for the third pair.
Borowiecki-Wideman
Or
Wiercioch-Gryba