Hockey Duckie
Registered User
We rave about Lundestrom, who likely will top out as an elite 3rd line center, yet complain about about Gaucher topping out as an elite 3rd liner. Oh the irony... Getting 3rd liners out of late first round draft picks is above the norm for that draft position. I wanted them to swing for the fences on Lambert, but I completely understand the pick.
That's because we already have Lundestrom. And we also have C Bo Groulx, yet another defensive specialist with some offense.
QMJHL productions
Groulx (D+0): 68 gp; 28g + 27a = 55 pts
Gaucher (D+0): 66 gp; 31g + 26a = 57 pts
It's kinda redundant, except that Gaucher is more physical and faster than Groulx at their respective draft time. What Lundy does have hand over fists on both is that Lundy is even faster and even better defensively at his respective draft time. Lundy was labeled as the most NHL-ready prospect, unfortunately, we put that idea to the test in his rookie year.
Improving the bottom-6 is a good thing, but we're missing top-6 talent depth. If we're gonna add a forward, then at least give us more upside potential. There was Lambert and Kulich available for the Ducks with top-6 potential.
But getting a defensive forward specialist with 3C ceiling doesn't seem right asset use. If we're that hell bent on a physical defensive presence and could be on the ice even longer, then why not a physical defenseman?
Maybe Gaucher can be Max Jones, but with more offensive talent. That could be helpful if he were on a line with Zegras. That's the hope b/c I don't think he'll displace Lundy at center. I still don't understand the pick, but I'll pull for him since he's a Duck now.
Yeah, you’re not going to get a can’t miss top 6 at 22. You can go boom/bust or a safe pick. Verbeek went the safe route.
Kinda odd. You'd figure to go safe at the NHL level and go upside at the draft. Instead, Verbeek didn't go the safe route at the NHL level by trading all UFA's, but goes safe, 3C at 22? Even Lundy had 2C potential in his scouting report.