Correct. Which is why I was wondering why they were even bringing it up. Doesn't matter if you touched the puck yourself, you can't play the puck after a high stick unless the other team touches it first.Maybe I'm remembering the rule incorrectly, but wouldn't the original high stick (assuming there was a high stick) negate the second attempt by Parise as Eddie O is discussing?
For the record, it looked like a good goal to me. I just didn't understand his reasoning.
Maybe I'm remembering the rule incorrectly, but wouldn't the original high stick (assuming there was a high stick) negate the second attempt by Parise as Eddie O is discussing?
For the record, it looked like a good goal to me. I just didn't understand his reasoning.
And AA on the ice. Has he really been on the ice for all the goals against?
Got walked like all the bad dmen. It's either that or let in a goal.
Ya he's the problem, he's the reason we took dumb penalties, he's at fault for our goalie letting in a shot a houseleage goalie would save, he's at fault for the goalie giving them the puck for an open net. Don't blame AA for everyone else's bs terrible play
AA wasn't on the ice for the Wild's 3rd goal. So, only 5 of them. Which still sucks
Lmao. Much better!
BTW was Zetterberg not on that powerplay that we just had? If not I agree with that decision - game is over.