BoKnows53
Registered User
- Jul 28, 2013
- 69
- 0
First off, it's obvious that Henrik's best hockey was played without Daniel, but aside from that, splitting up the twins would not only spread out the offence but make the top 2 lines a lot more versatile.
For example:
Line #1:
Burrows-Henrik-Jensen
On this line, we give Jensen the opportunity to prove himself on a top line, similar to how Chicago handled Brandon Saad last season. His confidence grew he developed alongside Chicago's best players
Line #2:
D.Sedin-Kesler-Booth
Finally Kesler would have a play maker on his wing. Daniel could feed Kesler and Booth as well as take the pressure off Kes while being another scoring threat
These lines offer more versatility rather than just stacking the top line.
Lastly, we have an abundance of wingers and prospects whom when called upon could play along side either of our playmakers when injuries occur
i.e
Shinkaruk-Henrik-Burrows
Daniel-Kesler-Kassian
For example:
Line #1:
Burrows-Henrik-Jensen
On this line, we give Jensen the opportunity to prove himself on a top line, similar to how Chicago handled Brandon Saad last season. His confidence grew he developed alongside Chicago's best players
Line #2:
D.Sedin-Kesler-Booth
Finally Kesler would have a play maker on his wing. Daniel could feed Kesler and Booth as well as take the pressure off Kes while being another scoring threat
These lines offer more versatility rather than just stacking the top line.
Lastly, we have an abundance of wingers and prospects whom when called upon could play along side either of our playmakers when injuries occur
i.e
Shinkaruk-Henrik-Burrows
Daniel-Kesler-Kassian