Well, assuming the players' ever agreed to a linkage between revenues and salaries, there is no question but that they would be in a better position to accept today than several months from now (absent a material difference in the % of revenues being offered by the owners). However, I don't accept that linking revenues to salaries will be the end result; if that happens, the players have been soundly defeated (unless, as I said, we're taling 60% or so of revenues and significant profit-sharing, not to mention an opening of the books and independent audits).
The owners will fracture and capitulate before the players, IMO. All the owners have done with their "offers" and "concepts" is further mobilize the players.