Who are the 3 most complete young d men?

[CrossCheck]

why isn't Barker mentionned anywhere?

 

[Lars]

why isn't Barker mentionned anywhere?

Well I chose Weber, Seabrook, and Ballard... Because they are proven and I see high upside in them.

Barker hasn't shown anything in the NHL yet, And apparantly didn't have the best year in the WHL, Although I still believe he has upside to be a good Two Way Top Pair Dman, Things are still up in the air.

 

[Buffalo87]

Weber
Seabrook
Ballard

In no order

Agreed

 

[Buddhaa]

Nashille is so good in drafting great defenseman. Their defensive depth is absolutely incredible! Weber, Klein, Parent, Hamhuis, Suter and several second tyer defenseman that might pan out - Laakso, Kulyash, Schaeffer.

 

[Hawkster]

why isn't Barker mentionned anywhere?

Because he's only played 1 NHL game and shouldn't be on this list.

Seabrook, Meszaros amd Ballard are my three choices.

 

[likeavoss]

Brent Seabrook. One of the few bright spots on the Blackhawks last year, and is quickly becoming one of my favourite players. Mature beyond his years, for sure.

 

[Gnashville]

Nashille is so good in drafting great defenseman. Their defensive depth is absolutely incredible! Weber, Klein, Parent, Hamhuis, Suter and several second tyer defenseman that might pan out - Laakso, Kulyash, Schaeffer.

You forgot Cody Franson

The 2003 draft was a year for Defensemen
Weber, Suter, Klein, Seabrook, Phaneuf, Coburn, Carle, I know i'm forgetting some

 

[TheRedressor]

Fedor Tyutin anyone?

22 years old, 25 points, not bad for a rookie dman.