Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 53,859
- 31,079
Title says it all, I've excluded ELC guys for obvious reasons but otherwise have both RFA and UFA to chose from, pick one, none, all or anything in between.
I agree. I'd bring back Talbot, but not at the reported $5M.I'm the lone Talbot guy so far! This team needs a veteran goalie, and I don't feel comfortable with Forsberg/Sogaard tandem.
Talbot bounces back to better form and hopefully injury free. Hard to get into a rhythm. We saw how Gus last year couldn't get into a rhythm, and now he is in quite the rhythm...
Where does he fit? He was upset that we acquired RWs and wanted to be traded, I thought. Now, there's 1 spot in theory and that's line 3 RW with Pinto and Greig - and even then, how do we afford him?Conor Brown
Yeah like it is those guys fault that they didn't make the playoffs lol. Find me another playoff team that did not have their No. 1 center for 70 games. Take your timeare we trying to be as bad next year as we were this year?
Brannstrom and Gauthier for sure, but Hamonic and Brassard should only be back if they accept near league minimums.
Yeah like it is those guys fault that they didn't make the playoffs lol. Find me another playoff team that did not have their No. 1 center for 70 games. Take your time
Conor Brown is better/more useful than Batherson and may be able to be signed "on the cheap" since he missed almost the entire season.Where does he fit? He was upset that we acquired RWs and wanted to be traded, I thought. Now, there's 1 spot in theory and that's line 3 RW with Pinto and Greig - and even then, how do we afford him?
Not better, but a more 2-way forward, yeah.Conor Brown is better/more useful than Batherson and may be able to be signed "on the cheap" since he missed almost the entire season.
If C. Brown wants a big contract then no thanks.
DBC - 8 X 8
Hamonic - 2 X 1.5
Brannstrom - 3 X 2
Watson - 1 X 1
Gauthier - 1 X 1
please
1.5 a year?