Top 10, not above any of the SJ teams.
Why not? Higher winning %, better goals for/against, 16-1 in POs vs. 16-3 for SJ.
There was teams that could of beat SJ, or even this year's Moose.
There was no one team that could touch the Moose.
I think as a whole Saint John face better competition, not to mention that their record was hurt by NHL camps and by the WJC's...
Not to **** on you guys, but given that no one could really knock you guys off.
Shawi could of done it to SJ, Chicoutimi too... Hell even the Oceanic came close. There wasn't as big of a gap.
For the Moose, it was always just them. That helped them.
If we're talking just stats then I have no argument. If not then I don't think they were better then the Sea Dogs.
All time? I'd put them in the top-5...
In my heart? Number 1.
Since there was no team that could touch them that somehow works against them? That doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
And the Moose lost guys to the WJC plus multiple injuries which included long stretches of time without Mackinnon and Drouin and they still won. That seems incredibly impressive considering the importance of those players. It's hard to compare.
All time? I'd put them in the top-5...
In my heart? Number 1.
There was teams that could of beat SJ, or even this year's Moose.
There was no one team that could touch the Moose.
I think as a whole Saint John face better competition, not to mention that their record was hurt by NHL camps and by the WJC's...
Not to **** on you guys, but given that no one could really knock you guys off.
Shawi could of done it to SJ, Chicoutimi too... Hell even the Oceanic came close. There wasn't as big of a gap.
For the Moose, it was always just them. That helped them.
If we're talking just stats then I have no argument. If not then I don't think they were better then the Sea Dogs.
Certainly some good points here, this season is one for the history books.Chicoutimi and Rimouski didn't even touch SJ, they went 1-8 combined. BC and RN gave us equal competition and equal success compared to last year...
it's hard to explain but, how do you know "it was always just Halifax"? There were competitive teams each time that could challenge SJ and Halifax, but maybe the Mooseheads were just miles ahead of every other team making it seem like there was more parity in the Sea Dogs years...
I don't know, and no one does... There's no right or wrong answer, all speculation.. Both had amazing depth at forward, and SJ had incredible D in 2011.
But you were on BAC's side all year and now you're saying a #7/8 seed was better.Certainly some good points here, this season is one for the history books.
I feel that Chicoutimi and Rimouski were better then Rouyn and BAC, but as you said there's no way to tell.
The Moose do have 2 top 3 picks on their team... I'm sure that helped. Then again SJ had 3 first rounders lol.
It's an interesting debate.
I think now, the question isn't who would win it all, it was who would finish #2...
Congrats on an amazing season.
But you were on BAC's side all year and now you're saying a #7/8 seed was better.
Wish these two could play each other, but this debate has come up before and we would need to fight for MacAulay lol.
Since there was no team that could touch them that somehow works against them? That doesn't make a whole lot of sense.