Anglesmith
Setting up the play?
I think we might, but its dependent on A LOT of guys panning out and in reality, that's not how the numbers work. So we got Poirer, Klimchuck, Jankowski, and Gaudrea as potential high end players, so based on the odds alone, one or two guys will pan out as projected, the other two might be depth guys or whatever.
Then there's our depth guys in Horak, Jooris, Reinhart, Knight, Granlund, Ferland, Agostino, Arnold, etc. Maybe half will make the NHL if we have a good system of scouts, development programs, etc.
Apply these same principles to goal and the blueline and you can see how the pool gets thin quickly. Our blueline has no projected top paring guy, but our goalie depth looks good. Either way, we lack high end guys, especially on the right, down the middle, and on the blueline IMO
Lack of high-end defencemen does seem like an issue, unless our current guys play like high-end guys (like they have been doing). But other than that, yeah, if a reasonable number of our top-end talented prospect turn into top-end players in the NHL, say even just Klimchuk and Poirier, then we have them, Monahan and Baertschi, plus probably Glencross and we can throw in a free agent.
I think a lot of people's viewpoints are coloured by the fact that things are just about as good as they could possibly be right now. Things will turn sideways this season. Even if we make the playoffs - and that's a very, very big if - we are first round fodder. Our heroic lucky run in 04 was due to God-mode Kipper and prime Iggy, and I don't see any equals to those two these days. People are forgetting that our **** finish last year earned us Monahan, who is a huge reason we're doing so well. Where are we with a 15th overall pick who's back in the OHL? 1-2-2, maybe. Then this thread doesn't exist and we're making mock drafts for next year.
There are so many ways to address this first paragraph. I'll list three:
People's viewpoints aren't coloured. No one is taking these first five games as proof that the Flames are going to challenge for the cup. The question was simply if we would be ok with this kind of play and success continuing. Winning a cup aside, people want to see playoff hockey. Anything can happen when you get to the dance.
People aren't forgetting that our bad finish earned us Monahan. First off, our season last year earned us Monahan, Klimchuk, Poirier and a host of other prospects. Our drafting in previous years has also been good, and our cupboards are fairly well-stocked as things stand right now. Gaining a top player through the draft is a compensation, not a goal that we should strive for every season. If your team is good enough to be successful, they don't need a new face of the franchise. Secondly, it might just be that people are remembering that Edmonton's three years of bad finishes allowed them to draft the best player in the draft in three consecutive drafts. Every year they got to re-sell the rebuild with a brand new young star. People also notice that the team is an absolute shambles in spite of that.
So, you're arguing that a team that can withstand the loss of Cammalleri, Stajan and Jones and pretty much not even miss a beat would be detrimentally worse without their ultra-green rookie?