Wednesday and Thursday meetings?

Status
Not open for further replies.

NYR1724

Registered User
Jul 6, 2004
487
0
New York, New York

jratelle19

Registered User
Jul 3, 2004
358
9
New York
All this optimism from last week will come crashing down yet again. I know logic tells us that after meeting for over 30 hours last week that they have gained momentum and that they might be close and it would make no sense to have things break down now.

But guess what? There has been nothing logical about this whole process or the strategies from either side. If there was a true sense of urgency they wouldn't be waiting 5 days to meet again for something this important.

I do not expect a deal anytime soon. This still has yet to get as ugly as it can possibly get. :madfire:
 

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
86,965
11,970
Leafs Home Board
chiavsfan said:
Maybe I should bust in Postal Worker style and demand a resolution since I am in the Chicago area
Excellent Bill Wirtz can now join the meetings this can be considered nothing but positive to move the process along ..

He refused to buy a ticket to NY or Toronto so this sames him some airfare to put back in his pocket ..
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
187,000
39,074
The Messenger said:
Excellent Bill Wirtz can now join the meetings this can be considered nothing but positive to move the process along ..

He refused to buy a ticket to NY or Toronto so this sames him some airfare to put back in his pocket ..



In fact, the meetings will actually take place at Bill Wirtz' residence, in his back yard so he doesn't have to waste electricity, gas and a/c. Come to think of it, I bet he doesn't even have central air.
 

LordHelmet

Registered User
May 19, 2004
956
0
Twin Cities
FLYLine4LIFE said:
5 day rest?? Some urgency.
It's not like they've been on vacation for the last 5 days. For every hour that the two sides are meeting together, you can bet that there's at least 2 hours that the sides are meeting seperately.

You don't just go to the table and negotiate without reviewing past negotiations, formulating a plan, trying to anticipate the other party's tactics, and determining which variables are most important to you.
 

King'sPawn

Enjoy the chaos
Jul 1, 2003
21,900
20,840
EndBoards said:
It's not like they've been on vacation for the last 5 days. For every hour that the two sides are meeting together, you can bet that there's at least 2 hours that the sides are meeting seperately.

You don't just go to the table and negotiate without reviewing past negotiations, formulating a plan, trying to anticipate the other party's tactics, and determining which variables are most important to you.

Exactly, and they could also be trying to discuss some of the other kinks in the CBA that will need to be addressed.
 

LordHelmet

Registered User
May 19, 2004
956
0
Twin Cities
Taranis_24 said:
No Bettman and no Goodenow. You would hope they would all be there. Hope they are at least on tele-conference.
That could actually be interpreted as a good sign. If they aren't there, suffice it to say that major issues won't be discussed. If major issues won't be discussed, and the meeting lasts for several hours, that means details were discussed.

This is pure speculation on my part, but say that last week's meetings (with BG and GB present) were for the purpose of working out a process that they will use to evaluate each team's financial information. They established what data needs to be gathered, how it will be organized, and what sources it will come from. Now that those ground rules have been laid, the bean counters get together and work through the process established last week while GB and BG work on the bigger picture.

This is the same way it works in most lines of work. Have the big hitters there for working out the big issues, then let the peons work out the details.
 

SPARTAKUS*

Guest
jratelle19 said:
All this optimism from last week will come crashing down yet again. I know logic tells us that after meeting for over 30 hours last week that they have gained momentum and that they might be close and it would make no sense to have things break down now.

But guess what? There has been nothing logical about this whole process or the strategies from either side. If there was a true sense of urgency they wouldn't be waiting 5 days to meet again for something this important.

I do not expect a deal anytime soon. This still has yet to get as ugly as it can possibly get. :madfire:
That's just it, the sense of urgency you are talking about was last week when they negociated for 30 hours. I am sure they have made significant progress last week to the point that the new cba is 75% complete. I am 100% certain that the lockout will be over by June 15. Both parties are now in the end games, the owners want to make some money and the players want to play. There will be a 2005/06 season.
 

jratelle19

Registered User
Jul 3, 2004
358
9
New York
That's just it, the sense of urgency you are talking about was last week when they negociated for 30 hours. I am sure they have made significant progress last week to the point that the new cba is 75% complete. I am 100% certain that the lockout will be over by June 15. Both parties are now in the end games, the owners want to make some money and the players want to play. There will be a 2005/06 season.

OTTSENS, you have no idea how much I am hoping that you are right and I am wrong. But, I'm not just being a pessimist for the sake of being a pessimist. I know that people may cite differences from the situation in February to the one today. Yes, I know that finally we have both sides using the word "progress" in a positive way after the meeting. Problem that I see is that we are assuming, due to what some media outlets are reporting as rumor, that Goodenow's level of power and influence has diminished. Yet no one from the PA has come forward and even so much as insinuated this, not that I would expect them to. They would be foolish to do such a thing during these bargaining sessions. Bob and Gary absent at these meetings this week could be a good thing, but as long as Goodenow is still in the picture somehow, someway, and as long as memories of February still come to mind, I have to remain a pessimist. Trust me, for health and sanity reasons I'm probably better off taking this approach. Like I said, I will be so glad to be proven wrong.
 

tmangos

Registered User
Jul 7, 2002
355
4
Toronto
Visit site
OTTSENS said:
That's just it, the sense of urgency you are talking about was last week when they negociated for 30 hours. I am sure they have made significant progress last week to the point that the new cba is 75% complete. I am 100% certain that the lockout will be over by June 15. Both parties are now in the end games, the owners want to make some money and the players want to play. There will be a 2005/06 season.
No offence but ... this sounds like it was written by Eklund!
 
Last edited:

gerbilanium

Registered User
Oct 17, 2003
274
0
And what's with this meeting in all these different places ****. Do these losers think they are in the Bourne Identity. Quit blowing your employers dollars by jetting all over the bloody place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad