FanOfSadTeam
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2010
- 9,457
- 9,864
I understand what you’re saying and think you’re probably right. I just had this exact same conversation with a friend, lol. I think it’s a big risk though. They were the better team in the first 3 games with Skinner in net and lost 2 of them. If Skinner goes off the rails again they’ll lose. It doesn’t matter how many they score for him, he’ll give up one more. Judging by what we’ve seen, that seems to be the most likely outcome.Ken Holland isn't making roster decisions right now. If he was Pickard wouldn't have started twice. This screams Knobby is forcing his players to not rely on goaltending and forcing them to take it to the Knucks. They got obliterated last game by doing nothing. This is him forcing them to go on the offensive. Not a bad strategy TBH
No arms, no legs and blindfolded.Even if they don’t rely on goaltending, go balls out, Skinner is gonna give a weak one or 3 back to the Nucks.
That’s the going rate with Skinner.
This is the equivalent of going into a fight with only 1 arm…or no arms even
Honestly, I'm not. The holes were apparent all season and they weren't addressed at the deadline. The ceiling for the team was limited as a result.I'm ultra disappointed in this team. Thought they were way better than this.
Gotta get Shkinny going.Pickard was our best player last game, this makes no sense
Yup.I'm 100% on the Pickard train but you have to play Skinner tonight, he is your starter. If he blows it and costs us the game hes forever a backup going forward (in theory). This is managements fault from the start
I'm just posting to join in the chorus of "why the f*** are they starting Skinner"?
I find myself often defaulting to siding with the team or management on decisions as us fans don't have the knowledge they do.
But you know what I do have? f***ing eyes. And the eye test says Moustache has been historically bad in 2 consecutive playoffs and that Pickard has actually given the team a chance to win in both of his starts.
Horribly bad decision in goal tonight. F**k sakes.
Agree with everything here. Skinner just seems to lag, wether its because of his athleticism or because of his ability to process where the play is going next.Starting Skinner makes absolutely no ****ing sense.
The difference in athleticism between him and Pickard is so apparent.
I thought Pickard was our best player last game by a wide margin.
Two 2nds+1st+4th for virtually no playoff contribution (AA trade added in), the buyouts, Nurse and Campbell contracts, rolling with Skinner-Picard, rolling with Nurse-Ceci. These will be Holland's Oiler legacy unless they miraculously win the Cup this season and that all goes away.What an absolute waste of a first round on Henrique.
The Soucy goal should've been an average save to be honest.Skinner? are you fking kidding me? makes absolutely no sense.
View attachment 872884
I wont be watching if thats the case, at least I believe in Pickard to make the average save. If Skinner is in my heart wont survive.
Yah zero logic to this.Yup.
I think that this is exactly whats going on here. The team committed itself to Skinner as the starter.
If they are going to go down then they will go down with the goalie they deem as their starting goalie.
What I dont like is how Holland clearly thought that a combination of Pickard and Skinner was Cup worthy.
If he didnt feel that way he would have resolved the goalie situation at some point during the season.