HockeyBasedNYC
Feeling it
They always talk about preventing concussions these days and the principal point of contact being the head. With all of the concussion issues in sports and the knowledge we are gaining on the issue, any method you can devise to steer players clear of getting hit in the head should be considered and taken. That is, if the NHL is truly serious about cleaning up the number of concussions in the game.
Whether or not there is intent to injure is beside the point. Dangerous, blind side, uneven height, by mistake elbows and "punk hit" plays with the principal point of contact being the head should all be thought as contributing factors, with varying degrees of severity taken into consideration.
When Hagelin was suspended 3 playoff games for the Alfie elbow, the principal point of contact was the head. There was obviously no intent to injure as Hagelin is not a dirty player and is trying to help his team when a playoff game. He screwed up and he payed the price. Protecting players with previous concussions or if they are all-time greats is also part of this issue. This situation is a perfect example of how the NHL is going the wrong way here, IF they are truly serious about cleaning up the number of concussions in the game.
If a player is suspected of suffering a brain injury due to a direct hit to the head delivered by an opposing player, the play should be inspected to see if it was an event that could have been avoided. That's it. Not about intent to injure, not about the events leading up to that point in the game. Could the blow to the head have been avoided? In this case i believe it could have and he should have gotten at least 1 game.
Some say it was a good hit and Stalberg shouldn't be skating in the middle of the ice with his head down. Well, if you haven't realized it by now, players sometimes skate with their head down. That isn't going to change. And it may have been a good hit - Problem is he got his head and in this day in age its the responsibility of the hitter to avoid it by either not targeting a player with his head down, not hitting them as high or not hitting with as much force or not hitting them at all. Even if it was a perfect, face to face text book hit and the forward had his head down and the principle point of contact was the head, the hitter should be suspended.
That is, if the NHL is truly serious about cleaning up the number of concussions in the game.
Whether or not there is intent to injure is beside the point. Dangerous, blind side, uneven height, by mistake elbows and "punk hit" plays with the principal point of contact being the head should all be thought as contributing factors, with varying degrees of severity taken into consideration.
When Hagelin was suspended 3 playoff games for the Alfie elbow, the principal point of contact was the head. There was obviously no intent to injure as Hagelin is not a dirty player and is trying to help his team when a playoff game. He screwed up and he payed the price. Protecting players with previous concussions or if they are all-time greats is also part of this issue. This situation is a perfect example of how the NHL is going the wrong way here, IF they are truly serious about cleaning up the number of concussions in the game.
If a player is suspected of suffering a brain injury due to a direct hit to the head delivered by an opposing player, the play should be inspected to see if it was an event that could have been avoided. That's it. Not about intent to injure, not about the events leading up to that point in the game. Could the blow to the head have been avoided? In this case i believe it could have and he should have gotten at least 1 game.
Some say it was a good hit and Stalberg shouldn't be skating in the middle of the ice with his head down. Well, if you haven't realized it by now, players sometimes skate with their head down. That isn't going to change. And it may have been a good hit - Problem is he got his head and in this day in age its the responsibility of the hitter to avoid it by either not targeting a player with his head down, not hitting them as high or not hitting with as much force or not hitting them at all. Even if it was a perfect, face to face text book hit and the forward had his head down and the principle point of contact was the head, the hitter should be suspended.
That is, if the NHL is truly serious about cleaning up the number of concussions in the game.