- Mar 19, 2023
- 3,271
- 1,721
I want to see Hunt get a shot, because I don´t think some of our defenders are good enough at the moment. So who do you think are the best of the listed players?
I'm with you here. Addition in the offensive zone? Just fine... the very instant it leaves the offensive zone?I'm torn, because i rate Addison as a PP guy, but otherwise am losing hope that he will ever figure it out. If we had another option of a guy to run the PP I would lose Addison in a second.
I would've said "yes" to Hunt last year, but he has had injury problems, and I've thought he had a sluggish start to the season. Would just as soon see ROR, who has noticeably improved over last year.
My thought, too, but it would be weird as hell having him man the #1PP as a rookie in the NHL, when he didn't even play it in college.Faber is skilled enough to run a PP in my humble opinion. But maybe it is too early in his NHL career.
Sometimes seems the Wild are trying to set a record for getting the most games possible from the 2010 draft.Middleton is the best. But is very one dimensional.
Same can apply to Addison, very good offensive but a headache defensively.
I like Mermis but I doubt he'll ever be more than a #6/#7 guy.
Hunt is young, skilled, and seems to be a very good professional and needs to given a chance to develop and gain experience. While Middleton is the best, Hunt is the most exciting at this point and most NHL ready defensive prospect.
Now, all this argument is meaningless because the answer is simple: bench Merrill. For a supposingly defensive defenseman, who kind of sucks defensively for the last 1.5 seasons. He isn't a big hitter either, he doesn't have a shot, he's like a captain ... so what does he offer?
That is why he needs to get a look. He may rise to the occasion, who knows?No idea with Hunt. I haven’t seen him enough to confidently project him as an NHLer like I could with Faber or can with Peart.
Agreed. While I am excited to see Hunt, I generally am prepared to downgrade all prospects but half a letter grade (or a full grade) from when they are projected to be when drafted to when they finally make it. NHL is hard to get to so be prepared to settle in a smaller role. So while it be nice for Hunt to be #4 guy, I think chances are he's just a #5/6 guy.I wouldn’t have any of these guys in my long term plans if I were GM. Hunt is the only one in my eyes with the possibility of changing that, if he takes big steps into the NHL. Most of these guys are playable as a rotating cast on the bottom pairing, but largely seem to be passengers. Soucy was a good #5 in my eyes, this selection is all #6 or worse at the moment to me.
Yes, I am being overly harsh on Middleton here as I think he’s generally ok, but it’s been a dreadful start for him so my tolerance levels are low.Agreed. While I am excited to see Hunt, I generally am prepared to downgrade all prospects but half a letter grade (or a full grade) from when they are projected to be when drafted to when they finally make it. NHL is hard to get to so be prepared to settle in a smaller role. So while it be nice for Hunt to be #4 guy, I think chances are he's just a #5/6 guy.
And I like Middleton and for his AAV but if you view him just skill-wise and not carried by Spurgeon, he's realistically a good #5 guy. A better Merrill. None of these guys are going to be long-term or at the very least, provide anything significant.
That's more like it.My parents let me play too many video games.
I have no discipline. Homework comes secondary to my twitch addiction.
I’ll be YouTube famous some day.
So many troubles.
Sigh.
This is what I thought the thread was going to be LMAOMy parents let me play too many video games.
I have no discipline. Homework comes secondary to my twitch addiction.
I’ll be YouTube famous some day.
So many troubles.
Sigh.